Is a single point in R compact?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fraggle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compact Point
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
6 replies · 19K views
fraggle
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Is a single point in R compact?

It seems obvious since every open cover of a single point in R can clearly have a finite subcover.

However, I have a little uncertainty (i.e possible convention that says otherwise?) so just wanted to check before using it in a proof.
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A subset of R is compact if it is closed and bounded (Heine Borel). A set consisting of a single point is certainly bounded and closed and therefore compact
 
It seems obvious since every open cover of a single point in R can clearly have a finite subcover.

That's it. No more work needed

VeeEight said:
A subset of R is compact if it is closed and bounded (Heine Borel). A set consisting of a single point is certainly bounded and closed and therefore compact

I would probably fail anyone using this argument on principle
 
Technical point: it makes no sense to talk about a point being compact. What you mean is that a set containing a single point (a "singleton" set) is compact. That's true in any topology, not just R or even just in a metric space. Given any open cover for {a}, there exist at least one set in the cover that contains a and that set alone is a "finite subcover".
 
Office_Shredder said:
I would probably fail anyone using this argument on principle

And I would say you would be in error to do so.

What would you say to this:

Let [tex]p[/tex] be the point. We know that there is some compact space [tex]K[/tex]. The map defined by [tex]f(x) = p[/tex] for all [tex]x \in K[/tex] is continuous. The continuous image of a compact set is compact. Therefore [tex]\{p\}[/tex] is compact. QED
 
g_edgar said:
And I would say you would be in error to do so.

I was mostly being humorous. However, I know a lot of teachers that specifically don't want people to use Heine-Borel to prove the compactness of sets because it misses the point (which is to demonstrate your knowledge of what compactness means).
 
g_edgar said:
And I would say you would be in error to do so.

What would you say to this:

Let [tex]p[/tex] be the point. We know that there is some compact space [tex]K[/tex]. The map defined by [tex]f(x) = p[/tex] for all [tex]x \in K[/tex] is continuous. The continuous image of a compact set is compact. Therefore [tex]\{p\}[/tex] is compact. QED
Oh, surely you can find an even more complicated proof than that!