I Is Braket Notation Causing Confusion in Quantum Mechanics?

DuckAmuck
Messages
238
Reaction score
40
Is |x+y> = |x> + |y> ?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. Take the inner product with ##<x|## to see that if ##y## is nonzero, the left size vanishes but the right side diverges.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
DuckAmuck said:
Is |x+y> = |x> + |y> ?.

The stuff inside a ket is some type of a label, and properties of a label depend the particular system, and on the type of label used.

For example, consider standard notation for the energy eigenstates of a harmonic oscillator. Then,

$$\left| 5 \right> \neq \left| 2 \right> + \left| 3 \right>.$$
 
  • Like
Likes RAMASUBRAMANIYAN
<x + y|x + y> = ∫ (x+y)^2 dV = ∫ (x^2 + y^2 + x*y + y*x) dV

(<x| + <y|)(|x> + |y>) = <x|x> + <y|y> + <x|y> + <y|x> = ∫ (x^2 + y^2 + x*y + y*x) dV

What am i missing?
 
George Jones said:
The stuff inside a ket is some type of a label, and properties of a label depend the particular system, and on the type of label used.

For example, consider standard notation for the energy eigenstates of a harmonic oscillator. Then,

$$\left| 5 \right> \neq \left| 2 \right> + \left| 3 \right>.$$
I see, so I can define |x+y> = |x> + |y>, but it's not implied automatically.
 
DuckAmuck said:
What am i missing?

The definition of what the x and y labels mean, i.e., what Hilbert space you are talking about and how the labels x and y index vectors in that Hilbert space. Without that you have no way of writing down integrals for the inner products at all, let alone knowing that they take the exact form you gave in post #4.
 
DuckAmuck said:
I see, so I can define |x+y> = |x> + |y>, but it's not implied automatically.
No, if you define it that way you will only cause confusion for others.
 
DuckAmuck said:
Is |x+y> = |x> + |y> ?
The problem with your expression has nothing to do with Quantum Mechanics specifically, but rather results from a confusion between mathematical objects, on the one hand, and labels for mathematical objects, on the other. Your expression is analogous to the following classical expression relating the velocities of two people: $$\vec {V}_{Jack} + \vec {V}_{Jill} = \vec {V}_{Jack + Jill}$$ There are situations where a family of labels can indeed have a useful algebraic structure (e.g. time ##t##), but the labels used in Dirac kets in this way are not among them.
 
  • Like
Likes Jehannum and Boing3000

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top