Is Cella Energy's Hydrogen Technology Truly Revolutionary?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gravenewworld
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Cella Energy's hydrogen storage technology and its potential implications for fuel use in automobiles. Participants explore the claims made by the company regarding emissions, engine modifications, and the nature of the technology itself, with a focus on its feasibility and environmental impact.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the validity of Cella Energy's claims, suggesting that the information provided is cryptic and lacks clarity regarding emissions.
  • Others note that hydrogen engines do not produce carbon emissions, only water, and argue that the technology is primarily a new storage method for hydrogen rather than a revolutionary engine technology.
  • A participant highlights that the company claims their micro-beads can be used in existing vehicles with few modifications, though skepticism remains about the practicality of this assertion.
  • Concerns are raised about the environmental impact of the micro-beads, with questions about whether they would be benign after combustion.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the actual emissions profile of the technology, suggesting that while carbon emissions may be absent, other emissions could still be present.
  • There is a discussion about the potential for the micro-beads to behave like liquid fuel, which could influence their usability in current engines.
  • Participants reference external sources to support their points, including claims from the company's CEO regarding the technology's capabilities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the validity of Cella Energy's claims. Multiple competing views exist regarding the technology's feasibility, environmental impact, and the clarity of the company's assertions.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the specific emissions produced by the technology and the environmental consequences of the micro-beads. There is also a lack of clarity regarding the modifications required for existing engines to utilize the new fuel.

gravenewworld
Messages
1,129
Reaction score
27
http://www.cellaenergy.com/index.php?page=technologyWhat does everyone think about this company's energy technology? Is it for real or is it a hoax? Information on their hydrogen storing nanotechnology that can be used as fuel in automobiles at the cost of $1.50/gallon, that requires no engine modification, and that is claimed to have 0 emissions is cryptic at best.
 
Last edited:
Computer science news on Phys.org
BTW, it is claimed that this technology was developed at Rutheford Appleton Lab in the UK, which is no joke of a facility.
 
Where is the emissions claim?

The best I found was saying it can be used to help lower emissions - note that Hydrogen engines don't produce Carbon emissions, only water. So that claim regarding Hydrogen engines is true. They don't claim this of petrol/diesel engines.

They also say you can use Hydrogen for fuel with "few" engine modifications, not none.

Their solution is simply a new storage technology for Hydrogen. I don't see anything wrong with that.

I'd also note the example engine shown includes a heat source which needs to come from somewhere.

Maybe read through it again, I think you might have misread it slightly. The claims aren't extraordinary, just reuse of standard known facts about Hydrogen as a power source.

Once again, they are only proposing a new storage technology with a little bit about potential engines.
 
Last edited:
jarednjames said:
Where is the emissions claim?

The best I found was saying it can be used to help lower emissions - note that Hydrogen engines don't produce Carbon emissions, only water. So that claim regarding Hydrogen engines is true. They don't claim this of petrol/diesel engines.

They also say you can use Hydrogen for fuel with "few" engine modifications, not none.

Their solution is simply a new storage technology for Hydrogen. I don't see anything wrong with that.

I'd also note the example engine shown includes a heat source which needs to come from somewhere.

Maybe read through it again, I think you might have misread it slightly. The claims aren't extraordinary, just reuse of standard known facts about Hydrogen as a power source.

Once again, they are only proposing a new storage technology with a little bit about potential engines.

http://www.cellaenergy.com/uploads/press/Filling%20up%20with%20hydrogen%20now%20a%20real%20possibility.pdf

Working with the London Centre for Nanotechnology at University College London and University of Oxford, scientists from STFC’s ISIS neutron source have developed a way of making tiny micro-fibres 30 times smaller than a human hair. These form a tissue-like material that is safe to handle in air. The new material contains as much hydrogen for a given weight as the high pressure tanks currently used to store hydrogen and can also be made in the form of micro beads that can be poured and pumped like a liquid. It could be used to fill up tanks in cars and aeroplanes in a very similar way to current fuels, but crucially without producing the carbon emissions.

Forgot to post that link.


http://news.discovery.com/tech/synthetic-gasoline-for-150gallon-and-no-emissions.html

“Early indications are that the micro-beads can be used in existing vehicles without engine modification,” said Cella Energy CEO Stephen Voller in this article on Gizmag.




But like I said, all the info out there on this company and what it is claiming are quite cryptic.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What would happen to the microbeads? Would they be environmentally benign?
 
gravenewworld said:

Well they're claiming to have come up with a material that puts Hydrogen in a more usable form. I can go with that.

They're saying they've come up with a material which contains the Hydrogen and in bead form reacts like liquid.

As long as the end result is burning Hydrogen then I can accept the zero emissions.

Whether or not they've achieved this is another thing - but I don't see why they couldn't have.

So far as in existing vehicles without modification, I'm not so sure. That would require it to have the same properties as regular petrol and diesel. Not impossible if you got the 'mix' right, but hardly a simple task.
 
gravenewworld said:
What would happen to the microbeads? Would they be environmentally benign?

Well I'd assume they get burnt - remember, they are saying no carbon emissions. This thing could be pumping out anything else, just not carbon.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
32K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
14K
Replies
4
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K