Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the classification of computational physics as a potential area of study for a PhD. Participants explore whether it is a distinct field or a subset of established areas such as high-energy physics (hep) or condensed matter physics, and debate its classification as theoretical or experimental.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- Some participants question if computational physics is a standalone PhD area or merely a branch of other physics disciplines.
- There is a suggestion that the classification of computational physics as theoretical or experimental depends on the specific activities involved, such as running simulations versus developing numerical methods.
- One participant notes that most computational work at universities is categorized under theoretical physics, emphasizing that computational physics serves as a tool across various branches rather than being a distinct field.
- A PhD student mentions spending a significant portion of their time on numerical simulations within the realm of theoretical physics, specifically in condensed matter physics.
- Another participant points out that some universities have dedicated computational physics research groups, indicating an institutional recognition of the field.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on whether computational physics is a separate area of study or a tool used within established fields. There is no consensus on its classification as theoretical or experimental, with opinions varying based on individual experiences and interpretations.
Contextual Notes
The discussion highlights the ambiguity surrounding the definition and classification of computational physics, with participants acknowledging the dependence on specific research activities and institutional structures.