In the EPR scenario the correlation results are explained with the conservation laws of classical mechanics as applied to spin. The Bell type inequalities are derived on expected spin values.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

But the violations of these inequalities are then explained with QM: That simultaneous knowledge of mutually non commuting observables is forbidden, collapse of wave function , non locality ...

If there were a more complete understanding of conservation of momentum as applied to the physics of spin with non- parallel detector settings could violations of the inequalities be explained classically ?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Is Conservation of Momentum Overlooked in Bells Inequality Violations

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**