Is Cubing a Permutation in Zp for Primes Equivalent to 2 Mod 3?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hello Kitty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conjecture that if \( p \equiv 2 \mod 3 \) is a prime, then the cubing function \( x \mapsto x^3 \) is a permutation of \( \mathbb{Z}_p \). Participants explore the implications of this conjecture, including its algebraic structure and the nature of permutations in modular arithmetic.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes proving that the cubing function is a permutation by examining the conditions under which \( n^3 \equiv m^3 \mod 3 \) leads to contradictions.
  • Another participant questions the meaning of the term "permutation" in this context, suggesting it may refer to a subgroup of permutations in \( \mathbb{Z}_p \).
  • A different viewpoint suggests that the cubing function is trivial, asserting that it acts as the identity on \( \mathbb{Z}_p \) for certain values.
  • One participant emphasizes the multiplicative structure of \( \mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z} \) and its relevance to the discussion.
  • Another participant clarifies that the cubing function could be better described as a bijection, challenging the notion of it being trivial.
  • Further contributions discuss the implications of group order and injectivity of the cubing map, suggesting that it may be bijective under certain conditions.
  • One participant introduces an algebraic perspective, noting that if \( X^3 \equiv Y^3 \mod P \), it implies a relationship between the elements that affects the order of the group.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing interpretations of the cubing function's behavior and its implications for permutations in \( \mathbb{Z}_p \). There is no consensus on the nature of the cubing function as a permutation, with multiple competing views remaining unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of the group structure and the conditions under which the cubing function operates, indicating that assumptions about the order of elements and the nature of the group may affect conclusions drawn.

Hello Kitty
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] cubic reciprocity?

I would like to prove the following conjecture:

If [tex]p \equiv 2\ (mod\ 3)[/tex] is a prime, then the cubing function [tex]x \mapsto x^3[/tex] is a permutation of [tex]\mathbb{Z}_p[/tex].

I've tried to find a contradiction to the negation by assuming that if [tex]n \neq m\ (mod\ 3)[/tex], but [tex]n^3 \equiv m^3\ (mod\ 3)[/tex], then since [tex]m^3 - n^3 = (m-n)(m^2-mn+n^2)[/tex], we must have [tex](m^2-mn+n^2) \equiv 0\ (mod\ 3)[/tex] to avoid a contradiction concerning zero-divisors. Now I'm stuck.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what exactly you mean saying "the cubing function [tex]x \mapsto x^3[/tex] is a permutation of [tex]\mathbb{Z}_p[/tex]"?

We know that there are [tex]2^p[/tex] permutations (sub-groups) in [tex]\mathbb{Z}_p[/tex], right?

So you mean that one of these subgroups represent a cube? If yes, is the sub-group sum or product?
 
I would have interpreted "the cubing function [tex]x \mapsto x^3[/tex]is a permutation of [tex]\mathbb{Z}_p[/tex]" to mean that it permutes the members of [tex]\mathbb{Z}_p[/tex]- but that's so trivial, that's probably not what's meant!

03= 0, 13= 1, 23= 2 mod 3. In fact, the cubing function is just the identity on [tex]\mathbb{Z}_p[/tex]!
 
3 isn't the only prime. :-p


As for the original poster... what do you know about the multiplicative structure of Z/pZ?
 
I thought "the cubing function [tex]x \mapsto x^3[/tex] is a permutation of [tex]\mathbb{Z}_p[/tex]" was a pretty unambiguous statement. Maybe it would be better to say it's a "bijection [tex]\mathbb{Z}_p \rightarrow \mathbb{Z}_p[/tex]".

HallsofIvy: Besides the fact that 3 is not congruent to 2 mod 3, in [tex]\mathbb{Z}_5[/tex], [tex]2^3 \equiv 3\ (mod\ 5)[/tex] so it is not the identity.

Hurkyl: It is a group of order p-1, which is of the form 3k+1. I guess the obvious fact that springs to mind is that no element can have order 3 then by Lagrange. This means no cube can be congruent to 1 mod p (except, of course, 1). So I guess this means the kernel of the cubing map is {1} ***alarm bells ringing*** actually this map is a group homomorphism so Ker={1} implies it is injective. Of course this implies it is a bijective too.
 
It can be looked at a little more algebratically: If X^3 == Y^3 Mod P, then there exists an element x/y such that (x/y)^3 == 1 Mod P, which implies 3 divides the order of the group, p-1. Thus, unless x=y, P would be of the form 3k+1. (Which is about what Hello Kitty is saying)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K