Is Derivative Notation Interchangeable When Evaluating at a Point?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pacopag
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivatives
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Pacopag
Messages
193
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Suppose you have a function [tex]f(x)[/tex].
You take the derivative with respect to x and evaluate it at some point [tex]x_0[/tex].
i.e. [tex]{{df(x_{0})}\over{dx}}[/tex] (e.g. first coeff in taylor series)
Is this the same as changing the argument of f to x_0, i.e. writing [tex]f(x_0)[/tex],
then just taking the derivative with respect to x_0?
In fewer words, can I write
[tex]{{df(x_{0})}\over{dx}}={{df(x_{0})}\over{dx_0}}[/tex].


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


If I just consider a bunch of examples, it always seems to be true. It seems like a trivial fact, but I would just like someone to confirm this for me.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No,

[tex]\frac{df(x_0)}{dx}[/tex] may be read as the derivative of f(x) with respect to x, evaluated at [tex]x = x_0[/tex]. I am confused as to how you were taking the derivative of something with respect to a constant.
 
You're right. It seems highly unorthodox.
Ok. Consider the taylor series (keeping only first order)
[tex]q(\Delta t)=q(0)+{{\partial H(q,p)}\over{\partial p}}\Delta t[/tex]
[tex]p(\Delta t)=p(0)-{{\partial H(q,p)}\over{\partial q}}\Delta t[/tex]
where the derivatives are evaluated at t=0. I used hamilton's equation.
[tex]{{dq}\over{dt}}={{\partial H}\over{\partial p}}[/tex]
[tex]{{dp}\over{dt}}=-{{\partial H}\over{\partial q}}[/tex]
Now regard this as a transformation from the old coords q(0), p(0) to the new coords q(Delta t), p(Delta t).
What is the Jacobian for this tranformation?