Is E1 or E2 the Correct Mechanism for Bulky Base Eliminations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the elimination mechanism in question is E1 or E2, particularly in the context of a bulky base and solvent. The initial choice of E2 is challenged by the presence of t-Butanol, which favors E1 due to its polar, non-nucleophilic nature and good leaving groups. Participants note that bulky alcohols typically do not engage in E2 eliminations, reinforcing the preference for E1 in this scenario. The conversation also touches on the conditions required for Hoffmann eliminations, specifically the need for a strong base, which raises questions about its applicability in this case. Overall, the consensus leans towards E1 being the correct mechanism given the provided conditions.
Zayan
Messages
47
Reaction score
4
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
TL;DR Summary: E1 or E2? I did the E2 hoffman elimination because it's tbuOh so it's bulky hence does E2 with Hoffman as major product so I chose option A. But the solution manual has done E1 reaction and rearrangement so the answer marked is C. What is the correct mechanism?

1000018084.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The alcohol is bulky and therefore NOT likely to be engaging in E2. Hoffman elimination has a strong base. Is there a strong base in this example?

E1 is favored by a polar,non-nucleophilic solvent like t-Butanol and good leaving groups like I. This is textbook E1.
 
chemisttree said:
The alcohol is bulky and therefore NOT likely to be engaging in E2. Hoffman elimination has a strong base. Is there a strong base in this example?

E1 is favored by a polar,non-nucleophilic solvent like t-Butanol and good leaving groups like I. This is textbook E1.
I had read that bulky bases do hoffman elimination (E2) because of less crowding.
 
Where did you read that?

Hoffmann eliminations apply to quaternary alkyl amines in presence of a strong base.

Is that the case here?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top