Question69
- 43
- 7
- TL;DR
- Is energy conserved in GR?
Is energy really not conserved in a constantly expanding universe?
The discussion revolves around the conservation of energy in the context of a constantly expanding universe. Participants explore the definitions of "energy" and "conserved," and reference existing literature on the topic.
Participants do not reach a consensus on the conservation of energy in an expanding universe, with multiple views and uncertainties remaining regarding the definitions and implications of energy conservation.
Limitations include the ambiguity in the definitions of "energy" and "conserved," as well as the unresolved nature of the discussion regarding the implications of an expanding universe on energy conservation.
Credit where credit is due, this bon mot is not original with me, it comes from this Usenet Physics FAQ article, also worth reading:PeterDonis said:it depends on what you mean by "energy" and what you mean by "conserved".![]()
Oh I've read that already, it was when I first found about it really, I just thought I'd ask you guys because maybe Sean is wrong :)PeterDonis said:The short answer is, it depends on what you mean by "energy" and what you mean by "conserved".Sean Carroll's blog post on the topic is a good place to start:
https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2010/02/22/energy-is-not-conserved/
Um, no.Question69 said:I just thought I'd ask you guys because maybe Sean is wrong :)
That would have been a good thing to mention in the OP of this thread.Question69 said:I've read that already, it was when I first found about it really
I should have, yes, and no.PeterDonis said:That would have been a good thing to mention in the OP of this thread.
Do you have any further questions on the topic?
I'll take that as "no further questions". Thread closed.Question69 said:I should have, yes, and no.