Is energy really not conserved in a constantly expanding Universe?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conservation of energy in a constantly expanding universe, emphasizing that the interpretation of "energy" and "conserved" is crucial. Sean Carroll's blog post, "Energy is Not Conserved," serves as a foundational resource for understanding this complex topic. Additionally, a Usenet Physics FAQ article provides further insights into the nuances of energy conservation in the context of General Relativity. The consensus among participants is that the concept of energy conservation is not straightforward in an expanding universe.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with the principles of energy conservation
  • Knowledge of cosmological expansion
  • Ability to interpret scientific literature and blog posts
NEXT STEPS
  • Read Sean Carroll's blog post "Energy is Not Conserved"
  • Explore the Usenet Physics FAQ article on energy in General Relativity
  • Investigate the implications of energy conservation in cosmology
  • Study the relationship between energy and spacetime in expanding universes
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, cosmologists, and students of theoretical physics seeking to deepen their understanding of energy conservation in the context of an expanding universe.

Question69
Messages
43
Reaction score
7
TL;DR
Is energy conserved in GR?
Is energy really not conserved in a constantly expanding universe?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PeterDonis said:
The short answer is, it depends on what you mean by "energy" and what you mean by "conserved". :wink: Sean Carroll's blog post on the topic is a good place to start:

https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2010/02/22/energy-is-not-conserved/
Oh I've read that already, it was when I first found about it really, I just thought I'd ask you guys because maybe Sean is wrong :)
 
Question69 said:
I just thought I'd ask you guys because maybe Sean is wrong :)
Um, no.
 
Question69 said:
I've read that already, it was when I first found about it really
That would have been a good thing to mention in the OP of this thread.

Do you have any further questions on the topic?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Question69
PeterDonis said:
That would have been a good thing to mention in the OP of this thread.

Do you have any further questions on the topic?
I should have, yes, and no.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy
Question69 said:
I should have, yes, and no.
I'll take that as "no further questions". Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
937
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
722
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K