Question69
- 43
- 7
- TL;DR
- Is energy conserved in GR?
Is energy really not conserved in a constantly expanding universe?
The discussion centers on the conservation of energy in a constantly expanding universe, emphasizing that the interpretation of "energy" and "conserved" is crucial. Sean Carroll's blog post, "Energy is Not Conserved," serves as a foundational resource for understanding this complex topic. Additionally, a Usenet Physics FAQ article provides further insights into the nuances of energy conservation in the context of General Relativity. The consensus among participants is that the concept of energy conservation is not straightforward in an expanding universe.
PREREQUISITESPhysicists, cosmologists, and students of theoretical physics seeking to deepen their understanding of energy conservation in the context of an expanding universe.
Credit where credit is due, this bon mot is not original with me, it comes from this Usenet Physics FAQ article, also worth reading:PeterDonis said:it depends on what you mean by "energy" and what you mean by "conserved".![]()
Oh I've read that already, it was when I first found about it really, I just thought I'd ask you guys because maybe Sean is wrong :)PeterDonis said:The short answer is, it depends on what you mean by "energy" and what you mean by "conserved".Sean Carroll's blog post on the topic is a good place to start:
https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2010/02/22/energy-is-not-conserved/
Um, no.Question69 said:I just thought I'd ask you guys because maybe Sean is wrong :)
That would have been a good thing to mention in the OP of this thread.Question69 said:I've read that already, it was when I first found about it really
I should have, yes, and no.PeterDonis said:That would have been a good thing to mention in the OP of this thread.
Do you have any further questions on the topic?
I'll take that as "no further questions". Thread closed.Question69 said:I should have, yes, and no.