Is Every Continuous Function on a Compact Subset of \mathbb{R}^n Bounded?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jjou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem from a practice GRE math subject exam concerning the properties of continuous functions defined on compact subsets of \mathbb{R}^n. The original poster is examining three statements related to compactness and boundedness of functions on a nonempty subset K of \mathbb{R}^n, specifically focusing on the implications of these properties.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to prove that if every continuous real-valued function defined on K is bounded, then K must be compact. They explore definitions of compactness, including closed and bounded sets, and the use of open covers.
  • Some participants question the validity of certain functions used in the discussion, such as the function f(x)=x, and suggest using projection maps instead to show boundedness.
  • There is a query regarding the definition of 'real-valued' functions, with a participant considering the continuity of a specific function f(x)=1/|x-c| and its implications for boundedness.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on the use of projection maps and clarifying definitions. There is an exploration of different approaches to proving the properties of K, but no consensus has been reached regarding the proof of compactness.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is working under the constraints of a homework problem, which may limit the methods they can use. There is a focus on the definitions of compactness and continuity, and the implications of these definitions are being critically examined.

jjou
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
(Problem 62 from practice GRE math subject exam:) Let K be a nonempty subset of \mathbb{R}^n, n>1. Which of the following must be true?

I. If K is compact, then every continuous real-valued function defined on K is bounded.
II. If every continuous real-valued function defined on K is bounded, then K is compact.
III. If K is compact, then K is connected.

I know (I) is true and (III) is not necessarily true. I'm working on (II), which the answer key says is true, but I can't seem to prove it. I tried using several versions of the definition of compactness:

Closed and bounded-
K is obviously bounded if you take the function f(x)=x. Then f(K)=K is bounded.
To show K is closed, I assumed it wasn't: there is some sequence (x_n)\subseteq K such that the sequence converges to a point c outside of K. Then the sequence f(x_n)\subseteq f(K) must converge to some point d, not necessarily in f(K). I'm not sure where to go from there or what contradiction I am looking for.

Covers / finite subcovers-
Let \{U_i\} be any open cover of K. Then \{f(U_i)\} is a cover of f(K). What I'd like to do is somehow force a finite subset of \{f(U_i)\} to be a cover of f(K) - possibly using the fact that f(K) is bounded - and thus find a finite subcover for K. The problem is that I don't know that I can find a subcover for f(K).

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The function f(x)=x isn't 'good', because it can't possibly be defined on K - K is a subset of R^n. To show that K is bounded, use the projection maps instead.

To show that K is closed, you can continue with what you're doing. Can you use the point c=(c_1,...,c_n) to define a continuous, but unbounded, real-valued function on K?
 
Last edited:
Just to clarify - when they say 'real-valued,' they mean the image is strictly in \mathbb{R}, not simply in \mathbb{R}^n?

I wanted to use the function f(x)=\frac{1}{|x-c|} which is defined for x in K. This function would be unbounded, but is it still continuous?




-----------------------------------------------------
Please check -
To use the projection maps to show boundedness of K:

For each 1\leq i\leq n, let f_i(x_1,...,x_n)=x_i. Then define each K_i to be such that f_i(K)\subset K_i\subset\mathbb{R}. Then K\subset K_1\times K_2\times...\times K_n is bounded.


Thanks! :)
 
Last edited:
jjou said:
Just to clarify - when they say 'real-valued,' they mean the image is strictly in \mathbb{R}, not simply in \mathbb{R}^n?
Yes, real-valued means the image lives in in \mathbb{R}.

I wanted to use the function f(x)=\frac{1}{|x-c|} which is defined for x in K. This function would be unbounded, but is it still continuous?
Yup - it's a composition of two continuous maps (x -> 1/(x-c) and x -> |x|).


To use the projection maps to show boundedness of K:

For each 1\leq i\leq n, let f_i(x_1,...,x_n)=x_i. Then define each K_i to be such that f_i(K)\subset K_i\subset\mathbb{R}. Then K\subset K_1\times K_2\times...\times K_n is bounded.
Yes, that's fine. Although on second thought I'd just use the norm map instead of projections to prove that K is bounded.
 
Got it. Thanks so much! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K