Is Every Group Isomorphic to a Subgroup of GLn(R)?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter copper-head
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isomorphism
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the statement that "every group G of order n is isomorphic to a subgroup of GLn(R)." Participants explore this concept, seeking clarification and proof techniques, particularly through the lens of Cayley's theorem and group actions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the validity of the statement regarding groups being isomorphic to subgroups of GLn(R) and seeks assistance in proving it.
  • Another participant suggests proving that the symmetric group S_n is isomorphic to a subgroup of GLn(R) as a means to demonstrate the original statement, referencing Cayley's theorem.
  • A participant expresses gratitude for the suggestion but admits unfamiliarity with group actions and requests an explanation of their relevance to the problem.
  • One reply explains group actions, illustrating how they can be used to prove Cayley's theorem and suggesting a method to embed S_n into GLn(R) through permutation matrices.
  • A participant recommends a book for further reading on the topic of group representations.
  • A later reply expresses excitement about finding the recommended book in the library, indicating that the problem has become easier to tackle.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the approach of using Cayley's theorem and group actions, but there is no consensus on the original statement's validity or completeness, as the discussion remains exploratory.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about group actions and their application, indicating a need for further clarification on this concept. The discussion does not resolve the original question definitively.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in group theory, particularly those exploring the relationship between groups and linear transformations, may find this discussion beneficial.

copper-head
Messages
31
Reaction score
8
Hello.
My book offers this statement with no proof, i have been searching in other books with no luck !
I'm beginning to question whether or not the statement is valid at all !
Here it goes:
"Every group G of order n is isomorphic to a subgroup of GLn(R)"
Could someone please help me out with this?
I'd greatly appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try showing that S_n, the symmetric group on n letters, is isomorphic to a subgroup of GL_n(R). By Cayley's theorem, this will be enough. And like the proof of Cayley's theorem, try to use group actions to prove the assertion.
 
Alright, that was a brilliant way of approaching it!
Thank you for clearing my path a bit!
However I'm afraid that i am not familiar at all with group actions! As for the Cayley theorem proof, i built the isomorphism between two groups using F(x) = ax where a is an element of my random group g and then took it from here.
Could anyone explain the concept of group actions a bit more?How does it relate to my question?
 
Group actions are nifty. I highly recommend you look into them.

For example, here's how one can prove Cayley's theorem using them. Suppose you have a finite group G of n elements. Let G act on itself by left translation, i.e. g(h) -> gh. This induces a homomorphism from G into S_n, whose kernel is {g in G : h=g(h)=gh for all h in G} = {e}, and thus G =~ G/{e} <= S_n. [Note that the homomorphism induced by the action is precisely the F you defined!]

Now here's how we could approach your problem. Let G be a group of n elements, now considered as a subgroup of S_n. Let {v_1, ..., v_n} be a fixed basis for R^n. Each element of G acts on this basis by permuting the indices. But there is also a corresponding matrix in GLn(R) that "does the same thing", namely the one whose rows are the basis vectors permuted accordingly. This gives us something we can use to get an imbedding of S_n into GLn(R).

Here's some reading: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representation_theory_of_finite_groups
 
Ditto morphism. For a really nice introduction try Neumann, Stoy, and Thompson, Groups and Geometry, Oxford University Press, 1994.
 
That is totally awesome.
THANK YOU GUYS.
They actually had a copy of the book at the library!
The problem now became very easy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K