Is f constant if limf(z) exists and is nonzero as z tends to z0?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a function f that is differentiable and non-zero in the complex plane, with a limit that exists and is non-zero as z approaches a specific point z0. The task is to prove whether f must be constant under these conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants question the correctness of the problem statement, noting that the complex exponential function satisfies the conditions but is not constant. Others express surprise at the implications of the problem as found in a complex analysis textbook.

Discussion Status

The discussion is exploring the validity of the problem statement and the implications of the limit condition. Participants are questioning assumptions and interpretations, with some suggesting that the problem may not hold true as initially stated.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of Liouville's Theorem as a potential method for proving the statement, and a discussion about the integral over closed loops in complex analysis, indicating a possible misunderstanding of the concepts involved.

AcC
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let f:C[tex]\rightarrow[/tex]C be differentiable, with f(z)[tex]\neq0[/tex] for all z in C. Suppose limf(z) is exist and nonzero as z tends to z0. Prove that f is constant.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you stating the problem correctly? The complex exponential e^z satisfies all of those conditions but is obviously not constant.
 
snipez90 said:
Are you stating the problem correctly? The complex exponential e^z satisfies all of those conditions but is obviously not constant.

Yes you are true!?? but I found this question in complex analysis book, I tried to solve but I hadnt thought that it could be false..!
 
Take limit e^z as z→-infinity it equal to zero, so it not satisfy the statement. I proved this statement with using Liouville Theorem.
 
In my books it's written that any integral over a closed loop [tex]\gamma[/tex] equals zero:

[tex]\oint f(z)dz = 0[/tex]

But at the same time it says

[tex]\oint \frac{dz}{z-a} = i 2 \Pi I[/tex]

where [tex]I[/tex] is an index number saying how many times loop [tex]\gamma[/tex] goes around point [tex]a[/tex].

Aren't they contradicting each other?

PS: what can I do to stop Latex going to new line every time I use it?
 
Uncle John, welcome to Physicsforums! Please open a new thread for your question.

AcC, in that case you should state that C includes the point at infinity, which most authors denote as C* or something similar, i.e. the extended complex plane.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K