Is f(x) = 1/log|x| Continuous at x=0?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter zorro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the continuity of the function f(x) = 1/log|x| at x=0. Participants explore whether the function is discontinuous due to its definition and the implications of extending its definition to include f(0).

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that f(x) is continuous at x=0, while another claims it is discontinuous because it is not defined at that point.
  • A participant suggests that to show continuity, one must demonstrate the existence of a delta for any epsilon, indicating a mathematical approach to the problem.
  • Another participant points out that if f is redefined to include f(0)=0, then it could be continuous at x=0.
  • Some participants reference the existence of a limit as x approaches 0, arguing that this does not suffice for continuity.
  • There is a mention of a numerical grapher providing an "approximate" graph, which may not accurately represent the function's behavior at x=0.
  • One participant compares this function to another example, discussing continuity in a different context, but there is confusion about the specific function referenced.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether f(x) = 1/log|x| is continuous at x=0. There are competing views regarding its definition and the implications for continuity.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of the function's definition at x=0 and the conditions under which continuity can be evaluated. There are unresolved aspects regarding the mathematical steps needed to establish continuity.

zorro
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
0
Is the function f(x) = 1/log|x| discontinuous at x=0? My book says yes. It is continuous according to me. Can somebody verify?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that all you have to show is that given some [itex]\epsilon>0[/itex], you can always find a [itex]\delta>0[/itex], so that for any x fulfilling [itex]0<x<\delta[/itex], we have:
[tex]\frac{1}{|\log|x||}<\epsilon[/tex]
 
The function f is not defined for x=0 and this is a condition, so it is not continuous in 0.

Note however, that if you expand the definition of f, so that f(0)=0, then it is continuous in 0.
 
My bad.
Of course it is discontinuous at x=0, since it isn't defined there.
I Like Serena has pointed out how to make a continuous extension of f, a feat that is possible since the limit of f at x=0 exists.
 
For another example, the function
[tex]f(x)= \frac{x^2- 1}{x- 1}[/tex]
is NOT continuous at x= 0 even though for all x except 0 it is equal to x+ 1 which is.
 
No it does not.
It shows a function where the two-sided limit at x=0 exists.
That is not sufficient to establish continuity.
 
Any numerical grapher can show only an "approximate" graph since it can calculate values only for a finite number of points.
 
The function f(x) = 1/log|x| for all x non-zero, 0 for x=0 is continuous.
 
  • #10
HallsofIvy said:
For another example, the function
[tex]f(x)= \frac{x^2- 1}{x- 1}[/tex]
is NOT continuous at x= 0 even though for all x except 0 it is equal to x+ 1 which is.

I assume you mean x=1 for that function. It's well-defined at x=0, it's f(0)=1.
 
  • #11
Thanks to all!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K