Is f(x,y) = (x^2) * exp(y) a convex or concave function?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mohitp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convex Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function f(x,y) = (x^2) * exp(y) is analyzed for its convexity and concavity. The Hessian matrix calculated is Hessian(x,y) = -2 * x^2 * exp(2y), which indicates that the function is concave since the Hessian is non-positive for all x and y. However, graphical analysis using an online 3D graph plotter suggests a convex appearance, leading to confusion regarding the function's nature. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the definitions of convex and concave functions, particularly in the context of multivariable calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multivariable calculus concepts, particularly Hessian matrices
  • Knowledge of convex and concave functions and their definitions
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and their properties
  • Experience with 3D graph plotting tools, such as online graph plotters
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hessian matrices in multivariable calculus
  • Learn about the definitions and characteristics of convex and concave functions
  • Explore the concept of saddle points in the context of multivariable functions
  • Practice using online graphing tools to visualize complex functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of calculus, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of multivariable functions and their graphical representations.

mohitp
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Could anyone comment on the convexity of

f(x,y) = (x^2) * exp(y) ... i.e. x square into e to the power y.

I did try to find Hessian of the same and the value I get is :

Hessian(x,y) = -2 * x^2 * exp(2y)... which looks <= 0 for all x and y.

I assume this should imply f(x,y) is concave. However when I plot this function using a 3D graph plotter it seems convex .

try
hp://ww.livephysics.com/ptools/online-3d-function-grapher.php

for plotting function.

I am sure I am making a simple mistake or something.

Any help would be useful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know why you would say that, even a rough graph looks concave to me. Using the website you give (you are missing a few letters) it looks concave. Are you clear on the difference between "convex" and "concave"? If, for any two points on the graph, the line segment between this is above the graph, it is "concave". It the line segment between two points on the graph is below the graph, then it is "convex".

(Some texts say "concave upward" and "concave downward" rather than "concave" and "convex".)
 
Hi,

Isn't f(x) convex if :

f( a*x1 + (1-a) * x2 ) <= a * f(x1) + (1-a) * f(x2)


this would imply graph must be below line connecting two points for function to be convex.
 
Be careful about Hessian, that is a multivariable function ! and if you work it out that is exactly what it is called a saddle point.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
865
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K