Is f(x,y,z) = 8xyz for Maximizing Volume in Ellipsoid?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function for maximizing the volume of a rectangular parallelpiped within an ellipsoid is defined as f(x,y,z) = 8xyz. This formulation accounts for the entire volume across all octants, as using f(x,y,z) = xyz alone only yields the volume for one octant. The constraint of the ellipsoid simplifies the problem, ensuring that the solution remains manageable and avoids complications arising from potential rotations of the shape in three-dimensional space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multivariable calculus
  • Familiarity with ellipsoidal geometry
  • Knowledge of optimization techniques in calculus
  • Experience with Lagrange multipliers for constrained optimization
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Lagrange multipliers in optimization problems
  • Explore the properties of ellipsoids in three-dimensional space
  • Learn about volume maximization techniques for geometric shapes
  • Investigate the implications of rotational symmetry in optimization
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineering students, and anyone involved in optimization problems related to geometry and calculus.

mohamed el teir
Messages
88
Reaction score
1
upload_2015-11-29_1-56-39.png


regarding question number 10, we have h = f + λg where g is the constraint (the ellipsoid) and f is the function we need to maximize or minimize (the rectangular parallelpiped volume),
now my question : is it right that f is 8xyz ? i mean if we take f to be xyz not 8xyz and solved till we got the value of xyz, the resulting value is a maximized rectangular parallelpiped in the ellipsoid in one octan only, i mean: to get the whole maximized volume we need multiply by 8, is this right ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes I suspect they want you to take f(x,y,z)=8xyz. Solving for that would give you the largest rectangular parallelpiped whose edges are parallel to the x, y and z axes. Solving the problem without that constraint in italics would I expect be very messy, since you'd have to allow for all possible rotations of the shape in 3D. Fortunately, I expect that the largest such shape is one that obeys that constraint anyway, although the proof of that is not immediately obvious. Since the problem would be so messy without assuming that, I expect they want you to assume it (or, more likely, they never even thought of that complication).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K