Is fluoridation of drinking water really necessary and cost-effective?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rabid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the necessity and cost-effectiveness of fluoridation in drinking water, exploring health implications, statistical correlations with cancer, and alternative methods of fluoride delivery. Participants examine both the benefits and potential risks associated with fluoride consumption.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express concerns about fluoride being a waste product from industrial processes and its potential toxicity, including claims of cancer and genetic damage.
  • Others argue that while there may be a statistical correlation between cancer rates and fluoridated communities, this does not imply causation, suggesting socioeconomic factors may play a role.
  • A participant discusses fluoride's role as a metabolic inhibitor in microorganisms, noting its effects on bacterial enzymes and the potential for regulatory issues in the body due to accumulation.
  • Some contributions highlight that studies generally do not find a strong association between fluoride exposure and cancer risk, with some animal studies being inconclusive.
  • Participants mention the correlation between unfluoridated water and dental issues, with some towns opting to add fluoride to combat tooth decay.
  • Concerns are raised about the effectiveness of fluoridation given that only a small percentage of treated water is ingested, questioning the overall point of such a widespread practice.
  • Some participants suggest that providing fluoride in the form of tablets or drops might be a more efficient method than water fluoridation, though they also consider the practicality of such an approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing views on the necessity and effectiveness of water fluoridation, as well as differing opinions on its health implications.

Contextual Notes

Participants note various assumptions, such as the socioeconomic status of communities and the cumulative effects of fluoride exposure, which may influence the discussion but are not fully explored.

Rabid
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
I have heard and seen a number of sites that claim that the fluoride that is put into water is a waste product of aluminum and fertilizer industries and that it is actually toxic and can cause cancer and genetic damage and a number of other health problems.

Is there any truth to this?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
There was found a larger incidence of cancer cases in communities that fluoridate water than in non fluoridation communities.
This does not mean that fluor causes cancer! Communities that fluoridate water are generally richer, so it is expected a larger lifespan and, in consequence, greater incidence of degenerative diseases, like cancer, Parkinson's and Alzheimer's.
You must distinguish statistical correlation from causation.
 
F is used as a metabolic inhibitor in several microorganisms. Just the other week we did a study on L.Plantarum and the relative fermentative productivity of it once it was exposed to NaF or Iodoacetamide. The results where that NaF was the more potent inhibitor and basically the little I know is that it can even stuff up bacteria that use manganese as their final electron acceptor. That is a big deal as most Mn2+ critters have this unknown way of dealing with free radicals like superoxide. That also means that these critters are somewhat resistant to the effects of visible light which can kill even some of the most adaptive microorganims like e.coli.

F is also pretty high up on the electron acceptor list so it can pretty much bind to any positive molecule. It restricts several enzymes in this way especially glycolysis enzymes. Now F or any pure element in great concentrations can cause big problems in the body, it their accumulation that may cause regulatory problems in the body.

The vast majority of people in Australia, US and I think Canada drink fluoridated water and for it to cause cancer would be its presence or a cocentration of it in the cancerous tissue. Atleast I would detect it causing cancer in this fashion, now in humans i have not seen any paper stating this or any study actually trying to observe this. A lot of the research I have seen on F deal primarily with it as anti microbial agent.

There are millions of studies and I like many are oblivious to most of them unless I am supposed to write a report or something. F to my knowledge if widely used around us and so are VOCs so basically to determine which causes cancer would very hard. I think it could be cumulative effect, genetic susceptibility should also be taken into account here.
 
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts11.html#bookmark06
Most of the studies of people living in areas with fluoridated water or naturally high levels of fluoride in drinking water did not find an association between fluoride and cancer risk. Two animal cancer studies were inconclusive. The international Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has determined that the carcinogenicity of fluoride to humans is not classifiable.
 
However, here in Oregon, a very strong correlation between rotten teeth and unfluoridated water has motivated even the smallest towns to add fluoride.

In fact...that gives me an idea for my well... :biggrin:
 
Ivan Seeking said:
In fact...that gives me an idea for my well... :biggrin:

dude, pretty soon, you're going to need to hire a full time operator!
 
I don't know about cancer, but my friends a dentist and she told me that the people you see whose teeth have white blotches on them all on the bottom and edges, its from too much fluoride in their system. they have very strong teeth that will never break, but it looks awful and there is no way to reverse it. dude, just brush your teeth and they won't rot out of your head. how difficult is that?
 
Ivan Seeking said:
However, here in Oregon, a very strong correlation between rotten teeth and unfluoridated water has motivated even the smallest towns to add fluoride.

In fact...that gives me an idea for my well... :biggrin:
My sister lives in a town that has unfluoridated water, so the pediatricians prescribe chewable tablets that contain fluoride for the kids. I would suspect pediatricians in other towns without fluoridated water do this as well. Therefore, if you're going to attribute anything to the fluoride, you're going to have to account for those obtaining it from sources other than drinking water.
 
  • #10
What is the point of flouridrating tons and tons of water when only a small 0.0003% is going to end inside the human body?? i mean. is the same water we use to wash the dishes, take showers, wash the car, clean the flor... what is the point? i still don't get it...
 
  • #12
Im glad I am on a well
 
  • #13
Burnsys said:
What is the point of flouridrating tons and tons of water when only a small 0.0003% is going to end inside the human body?? i mean. is the same water we use to wash the dishes, take showers, wash the car, clean the flor... what is the point? i still don't get it...
My dad has on the order of about 100 cavities.

I have 3.
 
  • #14
Burnsys said:
What is the point of flouridrating tons and tons of water when only a small 0.0003% is going to end inside the human body?? i mean. is the same water we use to wash the dishes, take showers, wash the car, clean the flor... what is the point? i still don't get it...

The same could be said for many aspects of water treatment (e.g., disinfection). I suppose it would be too expensive/complicated to provide multiple grades of water to every household...easier to make it all as clean as possible. But for fluoridation, I got to wonder if it would be cheaper for cities just to provide everyone with fluoride drops/tablets via the local pharmacy.
 
  • #15
Phobos said:
But for fluoridation, I got to wonder if it would be cheaper for cities just to provide everyone with fluoride drops/tablets via the local pharmacy.

But I wonder how many people would bother to take advantage of it. If the goal of the government is to get fluoride into everyone, the water supply would be a more effective delivery method.
As for being cheaper, I'm not sure of the costs of flouridation of water supplies, but to make, package and distribute tablets/drops to every pharmacy in a city over a long timescale must be quite costly I should imagine.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K