Is Goldbach's Conjecture Finally Solved?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DeadOriginal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conjecture
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The recent claim regarding the resolution of Goldbach's Conjecture, attributed to Bichitra Kalita, a computer scientist specializing in graph theory, lacks substantial verification. The assertion surfaced in an article from the Times of India, stating that Kalita's work will be published in the International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics. However, the mathematical community remains skeptical due to Kalita's limited publication history in number theory and the absence of a formal paper. Experts emphasize the necessity of peer-reviewed documentation before any claims can be deemed credible.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Goldbach's Conjecture
  • Familiarity with number theory and its significance
  • Knowledge of graph theory and its applications
  • Awareness of the peer review process in academic publishing
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the history and implications of Goldbach's Conjecture
  • Explore Terence Tao's contributions to modern number theory
  • Investigate the peer review process in mathematics publications
  • Examine previous claims of solved mathematical conjectures and their outcomes
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, computer scientists, and anyone interested in the validation process of mathematical claims and conjectures.

DeadOriginal
Messages
274
Reaction score
2
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...-year-old-conjecture/articleshow/16635760.cms

This came up on my twitter feed. Can someone verify this? I am in a state of disbelief.

India is always coming up with articles about people starting fires with their minds and stuff. Can this be just another one of those articles that are bs and are put up just for attention?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DeadOriginal said:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...-year-old-conjecture/articleshow/16635760.cms

This came up on my twitter feed. Can someone verify this? I am in a state of disbelief.

India is always coming up with articles about people starting fires with their minds and stuff. Can this be just another one of those articles that are bs and are put up just for attention?

Right now that's the only link that comes up on Google. Guess we'll have to wait to see what the pros say. At the end of the article it says that "The work will be published in the International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Kalita informed."

So there's a claim but not yet a paper.

He's not a mathematician ... he's a computer science specializing in graph theory. Graph theory seems a long way from modern number theory.

http://ijcsi.org/authors/Bichitra-Kalita.php

He's got one number-theoretic paper here but this is not the list of publications you'd expect from someone who solved a hard problem in number theory.

http://www.aec.ac.in/Uploads/File/faculty/mca/bichitra_kalita.pdf

Based on my experience with public proofs of theorems by people who are smart but not necessarily mathematical specialists, I'd say this may not hold up. Remember that guy who claimed to have solved P = NP last year?

Well without a paper nobody can have an informed opinion! Anyone can claim anything.

(edit)
I just checked Terence Tao's blog. He doesn't have anything about it. I believe he recently proved something really deep that's related to Goldbach. If he says something about this I'll believe it.

This blog is a great read, by the way. I don't always understand it but sometimes he's brilliantly clear about very complicated subjects. He wrote an article about nonstandard analysis that had me believing that I understood some of it.

http://terrytao.wordpress.com/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was stunned when I saw that headline. This would be some serious craziness if he managed to do it.
 
DeadOriginal said:
I was stunned when I saw that headline. This would be some serious craziness if he managed to do it.

I think we'd see some real news networks pick it up, but I will also defer to the experts.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K