Is Google's Ad Blocker the Solution to Improving Internet Experience?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jim mcnamara
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Google
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around Google's ad blocker and its potential impact on the internet experience, particularly regarding the types of ads that will be blocked and the implications for advertisers and users. Participants explore the motivations behind Google's decision, the effectiveness of the ad standards, and the broader consequences for the advertising ecosystem.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express concern that Google's ad blocker may favor ads from its own profitable sponsors, raising questions about potential censorship.
  • Others argue that Google's initiative is a response to the erosion of public tolerance for ads due to unsavory practices by some publishers, suggesting it could improve overall ad quality.
  • A participant notes that the ad blocker will only block ads that do not meet Google's established standards, which may not include Google's own ads.
  • There is a viewpoint that while blocking certain ads is beneficial for advertisers, it may not necessarily enhance the user experience, as it could lead to a "Google standard" that consolidates market control.
  • Some participants acknowledge that the standards for ad blocking were developed in collaboration with independent organizations and are considered reasonable to comply with.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the motivations behind Google's ad blocker, its potential impact on users and advertisers, and the implications of establishing a set of ad standards. No consensus is reached on whether the initiative will ultimately benefit or harm the internet experience.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of clarity on how the ad standards will be enforced and the potential biases in Google's implementation of the ad blocker. The discussion also reflects varying perspectives on the balance between user experience and advertising revenue.

jim mcnamara
Mentor
Messages
4,789
Reaction score
3,852
Google will try to improve net experience by blocking some types of lesser preferred ads.
The ad types are:
https://www.betterads.org/standards/

For North America. The problem with this approach (my opinion) is that a lot of ads on sites that originate in Asia are horrible offenders - India Business Times is an example. Google news actively refers to these sites for new articles. Hmm.

Maybe @Greg Bernhardt has some more definite views on this.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
There is always a dark side to these blockers like will Google favor ads from its more profitable sponsors or partners? or just basic censorship of certain types of adverts?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: QuantumQuest
I see this as an existential reaction from Google. The majority of their bottom line is still tied up in their ads. Many publishers have taken to unsavory practices and eroded the public's tolerance for ads. Google actually has very good quality control however by association they are lumped in with the more predatory publishers. This is a way to force those publishers to clean up so people don't have the knee jerk reaction of installing blockers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara and jedishrfu
jedishrfu said:
There is always a dark side to these blockers like will Google favor ads from its more profitable sponsors or partners?
Something that may not be obvious is that Google's ad blocker is not a full blocker. Only blocks ads they find that don't meet reasonable standards they have made up. Of course that doesn't include Google's ads, but to their credit they have very good standards already.
 
I also read about it today in cnn.gr and while this is a good thing in general - given that there is already a lot of ads that behave in an offensive manner, on the other hand I see it as a move that will favor google ads and at the same time will create some "google standard" about ads, that will clearly broaden google market given Chrome market share.

Blocking some ads instead of having an adware blocker (which blocks almost all) is a good thing for the companies / individuals being advertised but not necessarily for users - I don't preclude it, it may be and it will ultimately be judged by various percentages. On the other hand, I think that the main motivation behind it is total control of ads. I'll agree to @Greg Bernhardt that Google already has a good quality control but I can see no way of being objective - as any form of template or set of rules having to deal with so many different things anyway, Google is not to blame for this. Ultimately time will tell and I hope in some positive way.
 
QuantumQuest said:
On the other hand, I think that the main motivation behind it is total control of ads.
From what I've read the standards have been set in conjunction with a consortium of independent organizations and from what I've seen of the standards they are very easy and reasonable to comply with. Obviously Google has many different objectives, but I don't see any problems with this. Full disclosure I own Google stock :biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: QuantumQuest

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
16K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K