Is Gravity a Result of Mass Attracting Quanta of Mass?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the relationship between gravity, mass, and quantum theory, highlighting the ongoing challenge of unifying General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. Participants explore the idea that gravity could be a result of mass attracting "gravitons," suggesting that gravitational strength increases with mass, leading to a gravitational equilibrium between objects of different masses. There is debate about whether matter creates or merely warps space-time, with some arguing that both mass and energy play crucial roles in this process. The conversation touches on the speculative nature of quantum gravity and the mathematical complexity of physics, emphasizing the need for models that accurately predict physical phenomena. Ultimately, the discourse reflects a blend of theoretical physics and philosophical inquiry into the nature of gravity and space-time.
  • #31
Sorry for being vague. For what its worth the link cleared things up a lot. If the forum is not for sharing and building understanding, then what is it for? (I didn't ask for any replies to exclude mathematics).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Goolds said:
If the forum is not for sharing and building understanding, then what is it for? (I didn't ask for any replies to exclude mathematics).

It is for sharing and building understanding. It is not a substitute for reading books or for putting out the necessary intellectual effort on your end. Making posts like #17 without having studied the fundamentals of the subject is like expecting to be a rock star without practicing your scales.
 
  • #33
I wasn't claiming to be correct in my perception of the subject, merely stating my understanding of it. Which is, of course in violation of the PF Rules. Sorry.
 
  • #34
Goolds said:
I wasn't claiming to be correct in my perception of the subject, merely stating my understanding of it. Which is, of course in violation of the PF Rules. Sorry.

There is no rule on PF against being incorrect. I make mistakes on PF all the time. The rule is against overly speculative posts. What we're trying to get you to do is to post questions, ideas -- yes, and possibly speculations -- that are connected to your present level of understanding rather than flying so far ahead of it that they become meaningless.
 
  • #35
After consultation, the mentors have decided to close this thread. Goolds, we hope you stick around and learn from and contribute to the forum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
7K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K