Is Gravity Involved in the Motion of a Pendulum After a Collision?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

This discussion revolves around the motion of a pendulum after a collision with a bullet, specifically examining the role of gravity in this context. The original poster is exploring the reasoning behind the forces acting on the pendulum and questioning whether gravity should be considered in the analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the necessity of including gravity in a free body diagram and question the reasoning behind the problem's solution as presented in the textbook. There is a focus on whether gravitational potential energy is considered in the analysis and how forces relate to the motion of the pendulum post-collision.

Discussion Status

Some participants affirm the inclusion of gravity in the analysis, while others express confusion about the applicability of free body diagrams in this scenario. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between forces, motion, and energy conservation, with no clear consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of analyzing motion after an impact, with specific attention to the limitations of standard harmonic motion approximations and the implications of using forces in the analysis.

Maxo
Messages
160
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


image.jpg


Homework Equations


∑F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


This is a problem that can be solved by looking at impulse and momentum and I understand how the problem is solved in the book but I'm wondering about the reasoning before, if this is the only way to look at it. When I look at the picture of what happens, there is a bullet that hits a pendulum so it moves upwards. I would from looking at this assume that when the object (bullet + ballistic pendulum) moves upwards, there is a force of gravity involved. In the way the task has been solved in the book they didn't draw in a free body-diagram showing the forces acting on the objects. What I'm wondering is wouldn't the force of gravity actually be involved after this collision, when the pendulum moves upwards? And then shouldn't it be drawn in a free body diagram?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, gravity should be included in a free body diagram. Is that all you wanted to know?
 
Maxo said:
What I'm wondering is wouldn't the force of gravity actually be involved after this collision, when the pendulum moves upwards?

On the next pages, does the text take gravitational potential energy into account?

Maxo said:
And then shouldn't it be drawn in a free body diagram?

I don't see a free-body diagram. The diagram in the image you posted shows velocities (which aren't on free-body diagrams), and not forces (which are on free-body diagrams).
 
George Jones said:
On the next pages, does the text take gravitational potential energy into account?

Yes it does... which makes sense. But I still don't understand why this problem could also have been solved by looking at the forces in a free body diagram? Or could it?
 
Maxo said:
Yes it does... which makes sense. But I still don't understand why this problem could also have been solved by looking at the forces in a free body diagram? Or could it?
I presume your question is only in regard to the motion after the impact.
If you attempt it by forces and accelerations you will obtain the differential equation of motion of a pendulum. Since it would not be acceptable to make the usual SHM approximation, the equation cannot be solved in general. Time as a variable can be eliminated from the equation to produce an answer to this question, but what that is doing, in effect, is deriving the fact that work is conserved by the forces.
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K