Is human vision performed concurrently or step-by-step

  • Thread starter Thread starter sazr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Human Vision
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the processing of human vision, specifically whether it occurs concurrently or in a step-by-step manner. Key points include the role of the retina, which contains approximately 126 million photosensitive cells that compress signals before transmitting them via ganglion cells to the visual cortex. The primary visual cortex processes low-level features such as edges before the secondary visual cortex analyzes object size, color, and shape. The ventral visual stream is primarily responsible for object recognition, while the dorsal stream's involvement remains uncertain.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of retinal anatomy and function, including rods and cones
  • Knowledge of visual cortex structure, specifically primary and secondary visual areas
  • Familiarity with the concepts of ventral and dorsal visual streams
  • Basic principles of neural processing and parallel versus sequential processing
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of retinal ganglion cells in visual signal processing
  • Explore the functions of the primary and secondary visual cortices in detail
  • Study the differences between the ventral and dorsal visual streams
  • Investigate the parallels between human visual processing and artificial neural networks
USEFUL FOR

Neuroscientists, cognitive psychologists, and anyone interested in the mechanisms of human vision and visual perception.

sazr
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Is most of human vision processing performed in a linear step-by-step fashion in the brain or is it concurrent? Let's take for example; for the process of us recognising a pen on a table.
  • Light/information enters the eye, is focused on the fovea part of the retina because we are focusing on the pen on the table. This also means that many cones are being excited and emitting a signal (plus some rods are also receiving light and emitting a response I imagine?).
  • The eyes/rods/cones do some sort of compression or pooling before emitting their signals via the ganglia through the optic nerve to the visual cortex. I imagine both rods and cones do this because there are 126 million photosensitive cells and only 1 million ganglia.
  • The primary visual cortex starts finding edges and other low level stuff. Does this get performed before the secondary visual cortex or concurrently?
  • The secondary visual cortex begins processing for object size, colours, shapes. The ventral system is involved here. Is the dorsal system involved aswell? Does the ventral system require the processed edge information (from the primary cortex) in order to do its work? Is its processing concurrent?
  • Finally the ventral system recognises that there is a pen on the table.
Are you able to correct any mistakes I have above in the visual processing pipeline? Can you point out what steps in this pipeline are performed concurrently (if any) and what are step-by-step (and what that order of operations would be)?

Any advice about this process would be extremely helpful :)
 
Biology news on Phys.org
The retina is a large sheet of cells that passes signals in parallel (after a few processing steps to the retinal ganglion cells that go from the retina to the brain. There are several layers of cells in the retina that do some signal processing before it ever gets to the output cells, the retina ganglion cells. There are things like center surround detection and line detection in the retina, as well as probably adaptive functions for things like lighting level.

The ganglion cells project to the mid brain. Different sets of ganglion cells can project to different places in different species. In this way different signals can go to different areas of the brain. This is a pattern that can be repeated at different sets along the way. Different signals can end up going to several different places in the cortex, so this is kind of parallel but doing different things. However, each step is often a set of several cells, often retinotopic preserving the relationships of the visual field. This would be very parallel.

Any function like identifying an more complex object like a pen in a visual scene might involve building up images of the object and field through successive scans of the visual area (which often follow the lines in the scene). This would take longer and involve observations repeated in a short period of time to generate an internal "image" of what the visual system detects. Successive inputs would then update the scene and the objects.
 
sazr said:
Light/information enters the eye, is focused on the fovea part of the retina because we are focusing on the pen on the table. This also means that many cones are being excited and emitting a signal (plus some rods are also receiving light and emitting a response I imagine?).
Yes
sazr said:
The eyes/rods/cones do some sort of compression or pooling before emitting their signals via the ganglia through the optic nerve to the visual cortex. I imagine both rods and cones do this because there are 126 million photosensitive cells and only 1 million ganglia.
Yes, but the convergence is different for rods and cones: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK10850/.
sazr said:
The primary visual cortex starts finding edges and other low level stuff. Does this get performed before the secondary visual cortex or concurrently?
It is ok to think that the primary visual cortex does it work first, then passes the processed information to higher visual cortical areas. It is conceptually not much different from the processing done in artificial neural networks with many layers, also referred to as deep learning.
sazr said:
The secondary visual cortex begins processing for object size, colours, shapes. The ventral system is involved here. Is the dorsal system involved as well? Does the ventral system require the processed edge information (from the primary cortex) in order to do its work? Is its processing concurrent?
It is mainly the ventral stream, though I'm not sure what would happen if you removed lots of the dorsal stream.
sazr said:
Finally the ventral system recognises that there is a pen on the table.
I'm not sure where the "finally" or the little man in your head is.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3306444/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
22K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K