News Is Hussein's power over Iraq overstated?

  • Thread starter Thread starter turbo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
John Bolton's claims regarding the National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) suggest that intelligence professionals conspired to downplay Iran's threat, which many find absurd given the consensus required from 16 agencies. Critics argue that the NIE's findings were intentionally moderated to reflect uncertainties, and the delay in its release indicates a more direct assessment may have existed. The discussion highlights concerns over the integrity of intelligence reporting and the motivations behind political narratives, particularly from neoconservative figures. Additionally, the impact of Iran's decision to stop accepting U.S. dollars for oil is noted, with potential implications for global currency markets and U.S. imports. Overall, the conversation underscores skepticism about the motivations of key political figures in shaping public perception of Iran's nuclear capabilities.
  • #31
mheslep said:
Exactly.
Hussein's support of the Palestinian http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/04/03/world/main505316.shtml" is another example; if those same Palestinians had tried to run a popular movement inside Iraq that in anything posed a challenge the Bathist rule then Hussein would have no doubt squashed them too.

-------------
Happy Holidays All

It's surprisingly easy to overestimate the man, especially now that he's dead and Iraq these days is so full of life in many of the worst possible ways. But consider this. After the 1991 uprisings, Hussein failed to quell the Kurdish rebellion and essentially lost most of the territory north of Kirkuk. In the South, he never managed to stamp out Shia imams no matter how hard he tried--the man did his level best to wipe out the Sadrs and still the son managed to raise the second largest private army in Iraq within months of Baghdad's fall. Also, the 1991 uprising itself is spectacular in its scope both in geography and daring. Honestly, it's remarkable Hussein did as well as he did in 1991. Baathist rule over Iraq was concentric, with Baghdad fully under Hussein's control and the outlying governorates held in check by frequent kleptomania and occasional brutality. It was also nothing compared to Hafez al Assad's hold on Syria.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K