- 29,203
- 4,625
The discussion revolves around the availability of IPv4 addresses and the implications of transitioning to IPv6, with references to the IPv4EC project. Participants explore concerns about the depletion of IPv4 addresses, the historical context of internet protocols, and humorous takes on the situation.
Participants express a mix of concerns and humor regarding the depletion of IPv4 addresses, with no clear consensus on the implications or solutions. Some acknowledge the role of IPv6, while others question the management of IP resources.
The discussion includes speculative and humorous remarks, which may not reflect serious technical analysis. There is uncertainty regarding the actual status of IP address availability and the effectiveness of dynamic allocation.
Borek said:
Twenty million now. The site is not to be taken seriously, it has nothing to do with available IP addresses.Hepth said:The number is going up? 16 mil right now.
But they're allocated out of already assigned blocks, so there is no impact.Proton Soup said:hey, don't forget that a lot of IPs are allocated dynamically![]()
They can ping the class c's and take back anything that's not active. I have ISP's that have multiple class c's and they must be active to keep them.Grep said:And the last blocks have been allocated. This just showed up on Slashdot:
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/11/02/01/0036227/Last-Available-IPv4-Blocks-Allocated
"Following on from APNIC's earlier assessment that they would need to request the last available /8 blocks, they have now been allocated 39/8 and 106/8, triggering ARIN's final distribution of blocks to the RIRs. According to the release, 'APNIC expects normal allocations to continue for a further three to six months.'"
I think it's pretty lame that we've gotten to this point. It's not like it's a surprise this was coming, and yet just about everyone responsible has ignored it completely. That's people for you.
Zryn said:Anything that's not active ... like in Egypt![]()
Proton Soup said:see post #6![]()
nismaratwork said:I have to say, my first reaction was still... well... that's why we have IPv6! I'm glad Evo was there... I would have been confuuuuuuused otherwise.
lisab said:So...what happened to IPv5?
lisab said:So...what happened to IPv5?
nismaratwork said:2 pages, and you're the first person with the um... well (not balls)... "ovarian fortitude" to ask that very obvious question! I think you should get a confetti shower and cash prizes now.![]()
Proton Soup said:they were obviously just trying to sync up with IE 6. so might as well skip to IPv8 now.