Is It Ethical for a Professor to Kiss a Student?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the ethical implications of a professor kissing a student, sparked by a personal anecdote about a casual encounter at a bar. Participants explore the dynamics of student-teacher relationships, the potential for romantic interactions, and the boundaries set by educational institutions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant recounts a kiss from their professor while suggesting that intoxication reveals true feelings.
  • Another participant humorously questions the assumption that the professor was the only one intoxicated.
  • Several participants share personal experiences or hypothetical scenarios regarding relationships with professors, indicating a mix of humor and seriousness.
  • Concerns are raised about the ethical implications of student-teacher relationships, with some suggesting that once a student is no longer enrolled, such interactions may be acceptable.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the appropriateness of such relationships, citing institutional rules against them.
  • There are playful exchanges about the attractiveness of professors and the implications of dating within academic settings.
  • One participant reflects on their own experiences with dating within academia, noting the complications that arise from such relationships.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the ethics of professor-student relationships, with multiple competing views presented regarding the appropriateness and implications of such interactions.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying opinions on the boundaries of student-teacher relationships, with some referencing institutional policies that may differ between schools. The discussion includes humor and personal anecdotes, which may influence the seriousness of the ethical considerations raised.

  • #31
Moonbear said:
But after he burnt the dinner he was cooking and then spent the rest of the evening showing me his qualifying exam (and telling me how easy it was that even I could have passed it with what I learned in his class :rolleyes:), I decided not to date physicists anymore. I stick with engineers now. :biggrin: :smile:
Bah ! I bet an engineer would fail that qualifier ! :rolleyes:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Moonbear said:
I did go on a date with my physics TA when I was an undergrad, but that was about a year after I took his class; we just happened to run into each other after the class was over...he was taking a course down the hall from another class of mine, so we'd run into each other every week. But after he burnt the dinner he was cooking and then spent the rest of the evening showing me his qualifying exam (and telling me how easy it was that even I could have passed it with what I learned in his class :rolleyes:), I decided not to date physicists anymore. I stick with engineers now. :biggrin: :smile:
:smile: It's a good thing I was not drinking ginger beer when I read that - it would have hurt coming out my nose. I had to fasten the seatbelt for that one. :smile:

You're too much Moonbear.

Gokul43201 said:
I bet an engineer would fail that qualifier !
I bet an engineer could handle it. :biggrin:
 
  • #33
Gokul43201 said:
Bah ! I bet an engineer would fail that qualifier ! :rolleyes:
Double BAH! An engineer would have aced it.
 
  • #34
Gokul43201 said:
Bah ! I bet an engineer would fail that qualifier ! :rolleyes:

Didn't you study engineering before you started your physics PhD?

Engineers are just better with doing stuff with their hands. :wink: Dodges the projectiles thrown by the physicists...oh, no worry, they calculated all the trajectories right, but still can't throw. :-p)[/size]
 
  • #35
yourdadonapogostick said:
being ordained over the internet is just as valid as being ordained any other way.
Oh I don't really mind the method, it's the fact that your church is almost non-existant that makes it insignificant.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
8K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
12K