Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the appropriateness of mentioning citation counts for publications on a CV, particularly in the context of applying for academic positions, grants, or fellowships. Participants explore the implications of citation counts for co-authored papers and how they might influence evaluations of candidates.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Conceptual clarification
- Meta-discussion
Main Points Raised
- Some participants question the relevance of citation counts on a CV, suggesting that if a publication is significant, evaluators would likely be familiar with it regardless of citation numbers.
- Others propose that while listing publications is acceptable, including citation counts may not be necessary or appropriate, as interested parties can look them up independently.
- A participant notes that for postdocs applying for positions, it may be more beneficial to highlight substantial contributions to publications rather than focusing on citation metrics.
- There is a suggestion that the context of the application (e.g., grants, fellowships) might influence whether citation counts should be mentioned, but opinions vary on this point.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on whether citation counts should be included in CVs. There are competing views on the importance and appropriateness of citation metrics in academic applications.
Contextual Notes
Some participants express that the relevance of citation counts may depend on the specific academic context or the level of the position being applied for, but these nuances remain unresolved.
Who May Find This Useful
Individuals preparing academic CVs, particularly early-career researchers, postdocs, and those applying for grants or fellowships may find this discussion relevant.