Is It Moral to Accept Offers from Two Universities?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wasia
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the moral implications of accepting offers from two universities for master's programs, specifically focusing on the ethical considerations of potentially backing out of one offer after accepting both. Participants explore the nuances of financial commitments, scholarship offers, and the impact on other candidates.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the morality of accepting both offers, suggesting it could deprive another candidate of an opportunity.
  • Another participant recommends being honest with university A about the scholarship offer from university B to expedite their financial decision.
  • Concerns are raised about the ethical implications of accepting both offers, with some arguing it is unethical to commit to both programs.
  • Participants discuss the financial aspects, noting that the scholarship from university B only covers 70% of living expenses, while university A's funding is uncertain.
  • There is a suggestion to consider the importance of the professors at each university, as their influence may outweigh the university's ranking.
  • One participant shares their decision to accept the offer from university B due to the impending deadline, indicating a resolution to their dilemma.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the morality of accepting offers from both universities, with some agreeing that it is unethical while others suggest it depends on the circumstances. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the ethical implications, as no consensus is reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the uncertainty surrounding financial commitments from university A and the implications of accepting an offer without guaranteed funding. The discussion also reflects the complexities of graduate school decisions, including personal preferences and financial viability.

wasia
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I have got offers to attend two master programmes in universities A and B. B is a university in top 50, A is a university in top 5. B is willing to give me a scholarship, but I have to answer in one month. If I accepted the A offer, they would tell me something about finances after some 3 months. What should I do - is it moral to accept both offers and go with the better one afterwards?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would get a second opinion on this but could you not describe your situation to A and ask if it is possible to bring forward their decision on finances.It does seem a bit unfair accepting both offers and then backing out of one mainly because you could be depriving someone else of an offer.
 
I have tried extracting answer from A in every possible way - they are not willing to do it any time soon. What to do? Any arguments/opinions appreciated.
 
wasia said:
I have tried extracting answer from A in every possible way

Have you tried just being honest? Tell them you have a scholarship offer at another university, but you would rather go to their university. However, unless you are given a scholarship, this will not be financially viable. Thus, since you have a deadline to meet, you would appreciate it if they clarified the scholarship situation asap, and at most in the next couple of weeks. If they don't get back to you, or they say you don't have a scholarship, then go to the other university.

As for accepting two offers: I wouldn't. You never know what complications this may bring about in the future.
 
cristo said:
Have you tried just being honest? Tell them you have a scholarship offer at another university, but you would rather go to their university.
Yes, I have done exactly that.

As for accepting two offers: I wouldn't. You never know what complications this may bring about in the future.
It is a very important point - I completely agree.

However, I should probably disclose two important facts:
1. I have realized that scholarship from B covers only about 70% of living expenses.

2. When applying for A I have selected an option that I will not enter, if I do not get the funding.

Does that change anything?
 
wasia said:
Does that change anything?

It doesn't change the fact that accepting both graduate school offers (i.e., committing to attend both programs) is unethical. I suspect you'd think it pretty unethical if school B offered your funding to multiple candidates and rescinded their offer to you later.

As for making a decision, look at it this way: unless you get more information from school A, you have an offer with 0% funding and an offer with 70% funding. I'd press for a funding commitment from school A and, failing that, accept school B's offer as late as possible.
 
Mapes said:
As for making a decision, look at it this way: unless you get more information from school A, you have an offer with 0% funding and an offer with 70% funding. I'd press for a funding commitment from school A and, failing that, accept school B's offer as late as possible.

This is how I would look at it also. The question about morality is debatable, but it sounds like you consider it immoral to accept and wait for a better offer. I would feel that way also.

The thing about grad level work is that the Professor you work with is as important (perhaps more important) than the school itself. Is there any way you can link up with the Professors that are in your area of interest. Maybe you can talk to them in person or by phone to get a feeling for which school is really better for you personally. Also, if you hit it off with a Professor at the "better" school, perhaps he/she can get you an answer (or at least an indication) sooner.
 
Last edited:
Mapes said:
As for making a decision, look at it this way: unless you get more information from school A, you have an offer with 0% funding and an offer with 70% funding. I'd press for a funding commitment from school A and, failing that, accept school B's offer as late as possible.
That is a really objective way of looking at it.

elect_eng said:
Also, if you hit it off with a Professor at the "better" school, perhaps he/she can get you an answer (or at least an indication) sooner.
I have already tried that - he said he could not help me.

As today is the de facto deadline, I am taking the B offer.

Thanks for help, you've really made my choice easier :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
7K
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K