Is it possible that the force on a body is zero when its mass is zero?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of force and mass in physics, particularly questioning the implications of a body having zero mass while potentially experiencing acceleration. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the application of Newton's laws, specifically the equation F=ma, in scenarios involving massless entities.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the nature of massless particles, such as photons, and question the applicability of Newton's laws to them. There is also a discussion about hypothetical scenarios where mass could be perceived as zero, including the use of robotic arms to manipulate perceived mass.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing insights about massless scenarios and the limitations of applying classical mechanics to such cases. Some guidance is provided regarding the nature of forces on massless bodies, but multiple interpretations and questions remain open for exploration.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of mass and force, with references to special relativity and hypothetical mechanical systems. The original poster's inquiry reflects a broader curiosity about the foundational principles of physics as they approach the end of their high school studies.

randomgamernerd
Messages
139
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement

:[/B]
Ok, so my exams are coming and all sorts of crazy thoughts are banging my mind and now I have a question regarding a very simple law of physics, the funniest part, this is my last month of high school life...so at this juncture of life, i am having this crazy question.

MY QUESTION IS if Fnet=ma,
then is it possible that we have a body which is accelerating but its mass is zero(i don't mean negligible, but zero) and so we are unable to detect the force?
This seems quite crazy because when i say the body has absolutely zero mass, it means it does not exist, so this question should not arise.
Now let me explain what I mean when I say the body has zero mass.
I mean that the body exists, and it has a mass, but because of some reason, it is unable to exhibit the properties of mass, so we are considering the mass to be zero.
I know a body traveling at speed of light has almost zero mass..

But I would like to know some other situation where mass of a body is zero, i mean, the mass exists, but is unable to exhibit mass like properties..

Homework Equations

: F=:ma[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution

:[/B]
-
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Newton's laws apply to particles with mass.

Particles with zero mass appear in Special Relativity - they are called photons and represent light waves. But ##F = ma## is not applicable to them.
 
PeroK said:
Newton's laws apply to particles with mass.

Particles with zero mass appear in Special Relativity - they are called photons and represent light waves. But ##F = ma## is not applicable to them.
yah. i understand that...but any other situation?
 
A body having zero mass is just a limiting situation. Think syrofoam. In the limit, the forces on the body essentially always sum to zero, irrespective of the body’s acceleration. An example of this is when we encounter a “massless piston” within a cylinder, with the enclosed gas expanding irreversibly (very rapidly)
 
randomgamernerd said:
But I would like to know some other situation where mass of a body is zero, i mean, the mass exists, but is unable to exhibit mass like properties..

You could mount an object that has mass (M) on a robotic arm programmed to respond in such a way as to make it appear as if the mass was less (m).

For example if you applied a force F to the object the arm would add an additional force so that the mass accelerated at a=F/m rather than a=F/M.

Think human exoskeleton giving you super lifting powers :-)

However if you wanted it to reduce the apparent mass m to zero the robot would need to be able to accelerate infinitely fast which isn't possible.
 
CWatters said:
You could mount an object that has mass (M) on a robotic arm programmed to respond in such a way as to make it appear as if the mass was less (m).

For example if you applied a force F to the object the arm would add an additional force so that the mass accelerated at a=F/m rather than a=F/M.

Think human exoskeleton giving you super lifting powers :-)

However if you wanted it to reduce the apparent mass m to zero the robot would need to be able to accelerate infinitely fast which isn't possible.
how will I program to make it appear as if mass was less than m? is this possible ? or just an example to make me understand?
 
Chestermiller said:
A body having zero mass is just a limiting situation. Think syrofoam. In the limit, the forces on the body essentially always sum to zero, irrespective of the body’s acceleration. An example of this is when we encounter a “massless piston” within a cylinder, with the enclosed gas expanding irreversibly (very rapidly)
oh..right..
 
randomgamernerd said:
how will I program to make it appear as if mass was less than m? is this possible ? or just an example to make me understand?
Was intended as a example but could be done. The arm would need to detect the applied force and accelerate the object as if a larger force had been applied. I guess this is similar to how power steering on a car works. When it fails you find out how hard it really is to turn the wheels.
 
o
CWatters said:
Was intended as a example but could be done. The arm would need to detect the applied force and accelerate the object as if a larger force had been applied. I guess this is similar to how power steering on a car works. When it fails you find out how hard it really is to turn the wheels.
kay thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
3K