Is it possible to do astrophysics research

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Conducting astrophysics research from home is feasible for simulations but not for cutting-edge discoveries. Essential software includes Mathematica, MATLAB, C/C++, and Fortran, while significant computing power is often required for advanced simulations. While basic simulations can be performed on a decent desktop, serious research necessitates collaboration and resources typically found in academic settings. The discussion emphasizes that original discoveries in astrophysics are unlikely without access to university-level resources and expertise.

PREREQUISITES
  • Proficiency in programming languages such as C++, Fortran, and Mathematica.
  • Understanding of computational physics concepts, including partial differential equations (PDEs) and ordinary differential equations (ODEs).
  • Familiarity with numerical methods, particularly as outlined in "Numerical Recipes".
  • Basic knowledge of astrophysics phenomena, including black holes and supernovae.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research how to implement simulations of astrophysical phenomena using C++ and Fortran.
  • Explore the "Numerical Recipes" book series for numerical methods applicable to astrophysics.
  • Learn about high-performance computing options for astrophysics simulations.
  • Investigate online resources for collaboration opportunities in astrophysics research.
USEFUL FOR

Amateur astrophysicists, computational physicists, and anyone interested in conducting simulations or exploring astrophysics outside of traditional academic environments.

  • #31
Vanadium 50 said:
DavidWhitbeck, for a long time the state of the art was that a given simulation would either produce an explosion or a remnant, but never both. Things have improved, particularly with the huge increase in computational capacity that allows things like 3-d modeling of convection. This isn't my field, but my understanding is that today's models capture the gross features pretty well, but there's still work needed in getting quantitative agreement with things like light curves and r-process abundances.

Thanks for the info. Looks like things aren't too bad, more like just maturing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I'm sure the OP knows that the odds of making grand discoveries and advances are virtually infinitely against him. S/he plainly knows that.

S/he still wants to learn by coding up some simulations. I can get behind that, promote that, and encourage that. It is a fantastic idea.

I don't see the utility of discouraging him/her from trying it.
 
  • #33
"Is it possible to learn about astrophysics by doing simulations at home?" is a question that gets a much different response than "Is it possible to do astrophysics research at home?"
 
  • #34
ks_physicist said:
I'm sure the OP knows that the odds of making grand discoveries and advances are virtually infinitely against him. S/he plainly knows that.

I don't see that:


Benzoate said:
I want to eventually make my own original discoveries
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K