Is it Possible to Master String Theory with a Mathematics Background?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the feasibility of mastering string theory for someone with a strong background in pure mathematics but limited formal training in theoretical physics. Participants explore the relationship between advanced mathematical concepts and their application in theoretical physics, particularly in string theory, while considering the necessary foundational knowledge in physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about the difficulty of transitioning from pure mathematics to theoretical physics, particularly string theory, and questions whether self-study is a viable path.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on the term "theoretical math," suggesting that pure mathematics could be beneficial for string theory.
  • A participant lists advanced mathematical subjects they are studying, such as differential geometry and topology, and asks for opinions on their relevance to string theory.
  • One suggestion is made to study geometric algebra, which is noted as increasingly important for describing physical laws in a geometrical context.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of probability and statistics in the context of modern physics, particularly as it relates to the shift from deterministic to probabilistic models.
  • A question is raised about the ease of achieving proficiency in string theory with a strong mathematical foundation, while acknowledging the need to study various physics topics such as elementary particles and relativity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of optimism and concern regarding the transition from mathematics to physics. There is no consensus on the ease or difficulty of mastering string theory based on a mathematics background, and multiple viewpoints on the relevance of specific mathematical subjects to theoretical physics are presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the potential gaps in knowledge regarding foundational physics topics necessary for string theory, as well as the varying definitions and interpretations of mathematical disciplines across different educational contexts.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals with a background in mathematics considering a transition to theoretical physics, particularly those interested in string theory and its mathematical foundations.

Emilijo
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
I m first year in theoretical mathematics (graduate study), but I am very interested in theoretical physics, I have some knowledge in physics, general knowledge in mechanics and thermodinamics, electrodynamics, optics, waves, basics in quantum theory, but I am very interested in elementary particles and string theory. I have, obviously, a high mathematic knowledge, but it does not have many applications, I can do nothing with (I feel like not having any purpouse) so, it is difficult to reach a high level of theoretical physics? (I would apply my knowledge especially in string theory, but I think that would be too much difficult to jump from one level to another. What I can do, it is over to start now with strong theoretical physics (I am 22), or I can give a try? In the second case, I will study alone, without going on lectures and so on... I wolud just approach to physics as theoretical mathematician. It is possible, or I am nowhere in that way, niether I don t know mathematics, niether physics, and my life would be in a sh.t
What is the best to do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Theoretical Math? What? I have never heard this term before, do you mean Pure Math? What specifically are you studying? It might transfer over rather nicely to string theory.
 
Sorry,I m from Europe, In my country, we pure math call theoretical math.
So, yes. I study pure math, and there are subjects like differential geometry, metric spaces, topology, projective geometry, advanced algebra and group theory, algebraic number theory,
advanced probability theory, differential equations,...and stuff like these...
So, what do you think?
 
Emilijo said:
Sorry,I m from Europe, In my country, we pure math call theoretical math.
So, yes. I study pure math, and there are subjects like differential geometry, metric spaces, topology, projective geometry, advanced algebra and group theory, algebraic number theory,
advanced probability theory, differential equations,...and stuff like these...
So, what do you think?

One thing I would definitely recommend you study if you can is geometric algebra: this is becoming a very important way to describe physical laws not only compactly, but in a way that gives insight geometrically.

One other recommendation for any kind of scientific investigation and analysis is that of probability and statistics. The reason for this is that the old Newtonian paradigm is becoming replaced with the quantum paradigm: in other words, absolute determinism is getting replaced with a paradigm of uncertainty.

Also we are going from a description of a few degrees of freedom, to many many degrees of freedom and because of this, probabilistic and statistical methods are useful for analyzing these kinds of situations.

It's even good to use the uncertainty framework for modelling things that have a known deterministic description with huge numbers of degrees of freedom, since the computational complexity under our computational models can end up being intractable for the exact model simulation, but not for the random simulation which ends up giving information that is still accurate enough to be useful.
 
What about string theory? Will be easy to get this level with those mathematic tools I pointed out to you? I am aware that I will have to study elementary particles, relativity, field theory and stuff, but it doesn t seem difficult if you know mathematics very well. Is that correct? What do you think, is there a lot, lot of work to do to get this level, or it can be quite easy,
assuming that on these lectures (especially in differential geometry, topology, group theory, probability) we often connect mathematics and theoretical physics (differential geometry in relativity, group theory in elementary particles...)?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
940
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
822
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K