Is it possible to pursue theoretical physics investigation if that's not my job?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Engaging in theoretical physics research outside of a formal job is possible but fraught with challenges. The discussion highlights that successful research requires not only knowledge but also active engagement with the scientific community, including attending conferences and networking. Examples of individuals who have pursued research outside their primary careers exist, but their success is often limited, as evidenced by a cited paper with zero citations over five years. Ultimately, the consensus is that while amateur research is feasible, achieving recognition and impact in theoretical physics necessitates a full-time commitment and a deep understanding of what constitutes important research.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of theoretical physics concepts and terminology
  • Familiarity with the scientific publication process and citation metrics
  • Knowledge of networking strategies within the scientific community
  • Experience in attending academic conferences and engaging in discussions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of networking in academic success in physics
  • Explore the significance of citations in scientific research and their impact on career progression
  • Learn about the different fields within theoretical physics, such as condensed matter physics and astrophysics
  • Investigate opportunities for part-time or flexible jobs in physics-related fields
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for aspiring physicists, graduate students in physics, and anyone interested in pursuing theoretical physics research outside of traditional academic roles.

  • #31
chiro said:
With part 2 I know what you are getting at, but if someone wants to make a point and they are brief enough, I'll consider what they have to say. It is a risk in that you could have spent half an hour of precious time (anyone's time is precious in my opinion) and gone away thinking "why did I waste...", but then out of pure surprise you might have even taken away a nugget of truth or an idea even if it is hidden behind a sea of ideas that are complete rubbish.

There were 85 papers posted to the arXiv today in hep-ex, hep-th and hep-ph. If you spend a half-hour with each one, you've violated unitarity.

This points out another problem for part-timers. Just keeping up with the field takes a lot of time. Making your own contribution is on top of that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
878
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
677
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K