Is it possible to sumate this series?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Petar Mali
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the summation of the series \(\sum^{\infty}_{n=0}(2n+1)e^{-Cn(n+1)}\), where \(C\) is a constant. Participants explore whether it is possible to find an analytical solution for this series or if numerical methods are required, considering different values of \(C\).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that if \(C\) is negative or zero, the series cannot be summed, while if \(C > 0\), it may be possible.
  • One participant clarifies that they are not inquiring about convergence but rather about the possibility of obtaining an analytical summation versus needing numerical methods.
  • Another participant states that finding a "closed form" for the series may not be possible and suggests that numerical approximation could be the best approach.
  • A participant mentions that the series resembles those encountered in calculating the Partition function for a quantum mechanical system and notes that it cannot be computed in closed form.
  • Approximations for the series are discussed, including low temperature and high temperature limits, leading to integral approximations that can be solved by substitution.
  • Systematic corrections to the integral form are mentioned, referencing the Euler-Maclaurin formula.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the possibility of summing the series analytically, with some asserting that a closed form does not exist while others propose potential methods of approximation. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the analytical summation of the series.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the dependence on the value of \(C\) and the conditions under which approximations may be valid, such as low or high temperature limits. There are unresolved mathematical steps regarding the transition from summation to integral forms.

Petar Mali
Messages
283
Reaction score
0
[tex]\sum^{\infty}_{n=0}(2n+1)e^{-Cn(n+1)}[/tex]

[tex]C[/tex] - constant


Is it possible to sumate this series?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If C is negative or 0, then no, obviously. If C>0, then yes...
 
Yes [tex]C>0[/tex]. But I don't ask you if it convergate but can you summate analyticaly? Or you must use some numerical methods?
 
This is called finding a "closed form" for the series. I don't think one exists. So numerical approximation is the best one can do.
 
A theta function or relative ... because of the quadratic in the exponent.
 
That looks like the sum you need to do if you were to calculate the Partition function for a quantum mechanical dumbell. That sum cannot be computed in closed form. The typical approximations are to assume either low temperature ( [itex]C \rightarrow \infty[/itex]), in which case the sum is approximately

[tex]1 + 3e^{-2C} + \ldots .[/tex]

The other limit is high temperature, [itex]C \rightarrow 0[/itex], in which case the sum is approximately an integral,

[tex]\int_0^\infty dn~(2n+1)e^{-Cn(n+1)},[/itex]<br /> <br /> which is easily solved by substitution.<br /> <br /> Systematic corrections to the integral form can be computed using the Euler-Maclaurin formula:<br /> <br /> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler-Maclaurin_formula" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow ugc noopener">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler-Maclaurin_formula</a>[/tex]
 
Mute said:
That looks like the sum you need to do if you were to calculate the Partition function for a quantum mechanical dumbell. That sum cannot be computed in closed form. The typical approximations are to assume either low temperature ( [itex]C \rightarrow \infty[/itex]), in which case the sum is approximately

[tex]1 + 3e^{-2C} + \ldots .[/tex]

The other limit is high temperature, [itex]C \rightarrow 0[/itex], in which case the sum is approximately an integral,

[tex]\int_0^\infty dn~(2n+1)e^{-Cn(n+1)},[/itex]<br /> <br /> which is easily solved by substitution.<br /> <br /> Systematic corrections to the integral form can be computed using the Euler-Maclaurin formula:<br /> <br /> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler-Maclaurin_formula" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow ugc noopener">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler-Maclaurin_formula</a>[/tex]
[tex] <br /> Yes that is my problem. Sum is<br /> <br /> [tex]Q_1=\sum^{\infty}_{l=0}(2l+1)e^{-\frac{\theta_r}{\theta}l(l+1)[/tex]<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> [tex]\theta_r=\frac{\hbar^2}{2I}[/tex]<br /> <br /> Why we can say that if [tex]\theta>>\theta_r[/tex]<br /> <br /> [tex]Q_1=\int^{\infty}_0dl(2l+1)e^{-\frac{\theta_r}{\theta}l(l+1)[/tex]?[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K