Is it too hard "God Created the Integers"?

  • Context: Foundations 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gjmdp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard Integers
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers around Stephen Hawking's book "God Created the Integers," which compiles significant works in mathematics and science. Participants express concern that while the book is intended as a popularization, it includes complex texts by authors like Gauss, Riemann, and Gödel that may not be accessible to the average reader. The conversation also touches on the linguistic aspect of the term "divulgative," questioning its appropriateness in describing the book's content. Overall, the consensus is that the book may be challenging for those without a strong mathematical background.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic mathematical concepts
  • Familiarity with Multivariable Calculus
  • Knowledge of key historical figures in mathematics such as Gauss, Riemann, and Gödel
  • Ability to interpret academic language and terminology
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the works of Gauss, Riemann, and Gödel for deeper insights
  • Study the principles of mathematical popularization and its challenges
  • Research the concept of mathematical accessibility in literature
  • Investigate the role of historical context in understanding mathematical texts
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, educators, and anyone interested in the intersection of popular science and advanced mathematical literature.

Gjmdp
Messages
147
Reaction score
5
This Stephen Hawking book gathers the most important books along human history. In theory, this book is just divulgative, but, Gäuss, Riemann, Gödel... books included in Hawking's are not meant to be divulgative. So, any of you who read the book(/books if separeted) think it's maybe too hard. PD: I've got some basics on Multivariable Calculus, not much far away from that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gjmdp said:
This Stephen Hawking book gathers the most important books along human history. In theory, this book is just divulgative, but, Gäuss, Riemann, Gödel... books included in Hawking's are not meant to be divulgative. So, any of you who read the book(/books if separeted) think it's maybe too hard. PD: I've got some basics on Multivariable Calculus, not much far away from that.
What does that word mean in English?
 
I may be completely off-track here, but from the context it seems like he means the Hawking book is a popularization but the bibliography lists book that are not popularized for the masses.
 
smodak said:
I may be completely off-track here, but from the context it seems like he means the Hawking book is a popularization but the bibliography lists book that are not popularized for the masses.
Well, we could guess about it forever. Maybe he'll answer my question and we won't have to.
 
phinds said:
What does that word mean in English?

That's an attempt to make an adjective from divulge.
 
martinbn said:
That's an attempt to make an adjective from divulge.
Perhaps, but if so I fail to see how it makes sense. Why are we guessing about this? @Gjmdp how about you explain what you are talking about?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
11K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
14K
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
13K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K