Is it too old to do a PhD in Physics at 21 ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter KingCrimson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Phd Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the age at which one can start a PhD in Physics, particularly focusing on the perspective of a 21-year-old applicant who has faced delays in their educational journey. Participants explore the implications of age on university admissions and the typical age of PhD candidates in the field of physics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about being 20 or 21 when applying to top universities and questions whether this age will affect their chances compared to younger applicants.
  • Another participant asserts that it is never too old to pursue a PhD and emphasizes the importance of having a solid mathematical foundation for physics.
  • Several participants share their experiences, noting that many students start their PhDs in their mid-20s, suggesting that age is not a significant barrier.
  • One participant mentions that they are 28 and starting their PhD after being in undergraduate studies, indicating that starting later is common.
  • Another participant highlights that while some may perceive physics as a young person's game, there are many successful scientists who continue to contribute significantly to their fields well into older age.
  • Concerns are raised about the perception of age in academia, with one participant arguing that there is no age limit for pursuing advanced degrees.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that age should not be a barrier to pursuing a PhD, but there are differing views on the implications of starting at 21 versus younger ages. Some express that age may affect perceptions in competitive environments, while others argue that many successful physicists begin their advanced studies later.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference varying educational systems and timelines, particularly in the UK and the Netherlands, which may influence the typical age of PhD candidates. There is also mention of the challenges faced by older students balancing education with other life responsibilities.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals considering pursuing a PhD in physics, particularly those who may feel uncertain about their age relative to typical candidates, as well as those interested in the educational pathways and timelines in different countries.

KingCrimson
Messages
43
Reaction score
1
I recently moved back to the UK, but since I haven't been in the UK for the past 3 years, I will have to wait for 3 years to do an undergraduate degree. What's even more, my high school diploma, which is from Egypt, is not accepted to be equivalent to the British A-Levels, and so I am doing A levels at the moment. However, by the time I can apply to universities, I will be 20 or 21 depending on certain circumstances. Do you think my age will affect my chances if I apply to top universities? From a general perspective, do you think I will be expected to be better than the average 18 year old applicant, since I had two more years to be better or something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No it's not too old and actually it's never too old.

The real question is how much math do you have under your belt for physics?

If you get a BS and then wait ten years before going to grad school then you'll have to recover your math edge, a problem younger BS students fresh from the undergrad won't have to do,
 
I have been recently reading Poole's linear algebra and Larson's calculus. My math skills are alright. + I am doing an A-Level in mathematics at the moment, and even if I do take a gap year, I will be doing a Further maths A-Level.
 
So if you're doing okay then talk with your advisors about your plans and they can provide more accurate information about getting into a top flight school. Even if they say no then still apply because you can't win if you don't play the game.
 
Here people are 19 or 20 when they start their 5 year road to an MSc. Throw in a year delay and the average student is 27 when they start their PhD. Donno what you are thinking.
 
Almeisan said:
Here people are 19 or 20 when they start their 5 year road to an MSc. Throw in a year delay and the average student is 27 when they start their PhD. Donno what you are thinking.
Where exactly is here?
 
Plenty of students start a PhD later than that. I'm 28 and in my sophomore year of undergrad. I'll be starting a PhD when I'm 30 or so.
 
KingCrimson said:
Where exactly is here?
Netherlands. Ok, there are also people that are 18 and have no delay. It's a 3 year BSc and a two year MSc then a 4 year job as a research assistant/teaching assistant while you do your PhD research. Maybe you have to say that they are 21-23 when they enter grad school.

Just confused that you think you are way too old at 20 to start a PhD. If you had typed '23' I would be 90% sure you had meant '32'.
 
I hope not, I'm in my early 30s and in my first year of physics grad school.
 
  • #10
KingCrimson said:
I recently moved back to the UK, but since I haven't been in the UK for the past 3 years, I will have to wait for 3 years to do an undergraduate degree. What's even more, my high school diploma, which is from Egypt, is not accepted to be equivalent to the British A-Levels, and so I am doing A levels at the moment. However, by the time I can apply to universities, I will be 20 or 21 depending on certain circumstances. Do you think my age will affect my chances if I apply to top universities? From a general perspective, do you think I will be expected to be better than the average 18 year old applicant, since I had two more years to be better or something?

21-22 is when most people start physics PhD's seeing as how they graduate undegrad by then, most physicists are NOT a Julian Schwinger who finish their PhD's at age 21 and are doing pioneering work by age 25.
 
  • #11
clope023 said:
21-22 is when most people start physics PhD's seeing as how they graduate undegrad by then, most physicists are NOT a Julian Schwinger who finish their PhD's at age 21 and are doing pioneering work by age 25.
Almeisan said:
Just confused that you think you are way too old at 20 to start a PhD. If you had typed '23' I would be 90% sure you had meant '32'.
I think he meant starting his undergrad at 21, and then progress to a PhD.
 
  • #12
how I envy the young, yes you :wink:

I have 5 years of study to do before I can even think of school then it's 12 years of school :eek:
 
  • #13
I've heard a lot of people talk about how math and physics are a young person's game. They say this because typically the people who make grand innovations in our understanding of their fields do so before they're 30. But, there's plenty of people who are well into their 70's who are still doing great science and making progress in their fields. And 21 is definitely still a safe bet. If you were 35 as a first year undergrad and had to worry about holding a job while you work and kids and all the mess that comes with that age, you might have a problem. but even then a responsible person could still do it.

TLDR; You'll be fine :D
 
  • #14
A 21 year old is a child in a man's body.

There is no age limit to getting an advanced degree. If you were 60 I would say go for it. If you were 80 I would say go for it.

Contrary to younger peoples beliefs, you aren't actually dead past the age of 30. In fact I went back for my bachelors degree at that age.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K