Is Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics a Good Resource for Self-Study?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics" is not recommended for self-study, particularly for beginners in electromagnetism (E&M). While many have used the text, it is primarily suited for graduate-level courses and assumes a strong foundational knowledge of undergraduate electrostatics. Users often find themselves needing supplementary resources for clarification on omitted concepts and challenging problems. Overall, it is a widely used but complex resource that may not serve well for initial learning in E&M.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of undergraduate electrostatics concepts
  • Familiarity with graduate-level physics coursework
  • Ability to seek and utilize supplementary educational resources
  • Basic knowledge of classical mechanics and mathematical techniques in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore alternative E&M textbooks suitable for beginners, such as "Introduction to Electrodynamics" by David J. Griffiths
  • Research online resources and lecture notes for foundational E&M concepts
  • Practice solving problems from undergraduate-level E&M courses to build confidence
  • Join study groups or forums focused on classical electrodynamics for collaborative learning
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for undergraduate physics students, educators seeking teaching resources, and anyone considering self-study in classical electrodynamics.

ziad1985
Messages
244
Reaction score
0
The short version:I'm taking Classical electrodynamics this semester, I found out that I have this book:
Classical Electrodynamics by J.D.Jackson
Anyone know this book?Would it be a good choice to help me study?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, many folks have studied from this text... some with fond memories.. others, not so fond.
 
It's one of those texts that can be either good or bad, but you're probably stuck with it since it's so widely used.

From my experience with the text, I can safely say that it's not made for self-study. You will find yourself often looking to outside resources for clarification on certain derivations/concepts that Jackson omits. Also, some of the problems are very difficult (but that's what this forum is for, right? :biggrin:)
 
I'm not really stuck with it, I just have it...
It's not for self study, Like I said I just started taking the courses and saw that I have this Book..
My late uncle was a science book collector, in his library there is a few thousand books raging from biology to particle physics(I don't know why he collected them)anyway they are all mine(stuff related to physics), I'll see if I find other books on the same subject..
 
Last edited:
here's a list:
 
ziad1985 said:
I'm not really stuck with it, I just have it...
It's not for self study, Like I said I just started taking the courses and saw that I have this Book..
My late uncle was a science book collector, in his library there is a few thousand books raging from biology to particle physics(I don't know why he collected them)anyway they are all mine(stuff related to physics), I'll see if I find other books on the same subject..

Er.. if you are just starting to learn E&M, that book is not something you want to use. All the stuff you learn in undergraduate electrostatics is compressed into Jackson's Introduction! So it is not a good book to start learning E&M from. Jackson's book tends to be used in graduate level E&M courses.

Zz.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
681
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K