xxChrisxx
- 2,056
- 85
DaveC426913 said:This is a straw man. Straw men tend to be invoked when one's argument against the subject at hand is weak and one wishes to move the argument to a more advantageous battlefield. I don't think that's what you intended to portray. Stick to the subject at-hand.
It's not a staw man, its an analogy. A bloody good one too.
You think that pointing out logical fallacies, seemingly at random makes you sound like you are a cool debater. They do not. you also always do it when you are stumped at a sensible answer. The analogy in this case was spot on, and used as an aid for you to attempt to make the mental leap as to why you are talking utter rubbish.If you want to play that little game of name the fallacy. post hoc ergo propter hoc.
You are attributing an effect to a cause, the effect is bad, and implying that getting rid of the cause will solve the problem. Which is utter tosh. Girls (and boys for that matter) who starve themselves do it becuase of a. mental illness and b. lack of security with themselves. Getting rid of skinny stereotypes would do nothing to solve the problem.No. Normal young girls who do not need to lose weight are starving themselves sick to model themselves after her and other unhealthily skinny stereotypes.
People can't possible be anorxic to look like Kate Mass, as skeletor above looks disgusting, but Kate Moss looks fit as a butchers dog.
Last edited: