C/C++ Is Learning C++/Python for Computational Physics Worth It Over Mathematica?

[zoltrix]

hello

I am interested in computational physics at an amateur level
is it worth while learning complex numerical methods with C++ /Python to solve partial differential equations as well as for other physical applications while a software such as mathematica can do the job for you ?

 

[FactChecker]

IMO, if there is a well-established, specialized language targeted at your application, it is easier to use. If cost is not a problem, use Mathematica.

 

[DrClaude]

If cost is not a problem, use Mathematica.

I second this. Mathematica is very versatile and you will be able to get much more out of it.

If you chose to go with Mathematica, I recommend the book Computational Methods for Physics by Joel Franklin.

 

[Dale]

I got Mathematica in 1995 and I continue to use it today for exploring physics.

 

[vanhees71]

A less expensive alternative is Python. As Mathematica it provides both computer algebra and numerics.

 

[malawi_glenn]

Octave is fun too, it is basically a free version of Matlab

 

[George Jones]

For a very pragmatic reason, I use Maple. My employer has a site license, so I get for free the full version on my office desktop, and on my laptop. I have made extensive use of this both professionally and recreationally.