Is life on earth a one-time event?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the hypothesis of a single origin of life on Earth, questioning the existence of multiple foundation species. Evidence suggests that all known life shares common polymers, such as nucleic acids and protein catalysts, and consists of a limited subset of 22 amino acids from over 390 naturally occurring ones. The conversation highlights the probability argument surrounding life's origin and mentions ongoing research into non-DNA-based microbial life that may have existed during Earth's early history. Key references include the Miller-Urey experiment and various articles discussing the fundamental unity of life.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of molecular biology concepts, particularly nucleic acids and proteins.
  • Familiarity with the Miller-Urey experiment and its implications for abiogenesis.
  • Knowledge of amino acid diversity and its relevance to life's biochemical foundation.
  • Awareness of current research methodologies in astrobiology and microbial life detection.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Miller-Urey experiment on the origin of life theories.
  • Explore the concept of non-DNA-based life forms and their potential existence on Earth.
  • Investigate the role of thermodynamics in prebiotic synthesis of amino acids.
  • Examine current studies on the search for extraterrestrial life and its foundational biochemistry.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in astrobiology, molecular biologists, and anyone interested in the origins of life and the potential for alternative life forms in the universe.

Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,213
Reaction score
2,657
What level of confidence can be assigned to the statement that all life on Earth has one point of origin - a foundation species? Also, is there any evidence that there may have been other genetic lines, other foundation species and their descendents, that did not survive.

I am not asserting or implying anything, I am only asking.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
It is, at its core, a probability argument. I suppose that it is possible to view the origin of life as chemical selection operating on different versions yet in the end, only one succeeded. It is worth noting that as far as we know, all life shares common polymers, Nucleic acids and protein catalysts. There are over 390 naturally occurring amino acids known, yet all living organisms consist of the same subset of 22 amino acids. There also seem to be some early indications that amino acids in this subset could be thermodynamically favored in prebiotic synthesis.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/section1.html#fundamental_unity
http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2009/04/ten-amino-acids.html
 
Moridin said:
It is, at its core, a probability argument.
Not necessarily. There is current active research looking for non-DNA-based microbial life here on Earth, assumedly left over from Earth's formative years. The idea that we've never seen evidence of it is that it would have slipped right through the cracks of all our current tests - whether that means not detected or merely not differentiated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K