Is Linux Too Complicated for the Average User?

  • Thread starter Thread starter damgo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Os
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the complexities and user experiences of various operating systems, particularly Windows and Linux. Users express a preference for Linux due to its security and stability, contrasting it with the instability of Windows ME and the reliability of Windows XP. Specific mentions include Red Hat 8 and Debian, highlighting the differences in user interfaces and installation processes. The conversation reveals a clear divide in user satisfaction, with many advocating for Linux as a superior choice for those seeking a robust operating system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of operating system fundamentals, specifically Windows and Linux.
  • Familiarity with Linux distributions such as Red Hat and Debian.
  • Knowledge of package management systems like RPM and APT.
  • Basic command line proficiency for Linux environments.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the differences between Linux distributions, focusing on Red Hat and Debian.
  • Learn about Linux package management systems, specifically RPM and APT.
  • Investigate the installation processes for software on Linux versus Windows.
  • Research user interface options in Linux, including GNOME and KDE.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for IT professionals, system administrators, and users transitioning from Windows to Linux who seek insights into operating system performance and usability.

What OS do you use the most?

  • Windows 2000/XP

    Votes: 31 43.7%
  • Windows 95/98/ME

    Votes: 19 26.8%
  • Linux

    Votes: 12 16.9%
  • Other UNIX

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • MacOS X

    Votes: 8 11.3%
  • Older MacOS

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    71
  • #31
Sorry, what wasn't phrased very well. What i meant was that linux in general doesn't have a package management system. Sure some of the distros do like redhat, slackware, debian, etc but not all of them. For example, I'm pretty sure the floppy version of keeper linux and smoothwall don't have a package managment system. I'm not completely sure, though.
-HBar
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
  • #32
floppy version of keeper linux and smoothwall don't have a package managment system.

Keeper doesn't, I've never looked through smoothwall, however.

And Hello, since this is my first post. I mainly use XP at the moment, but I have 4 other computers running various things. 3.1 and RedHat are the main other OSs.
 
  • #33
I use XP at school and since I started my job in the physics and mathematics lab, I've used XP a lot more.

However...

I still have 98 at home and I still find it useful for the tasks I need to perform. So I'll quote the heading of the guitar lessons of Angus of AC/DC in Guitar World magazine: "If it ain't broken, why fix it?"
 
  • #34
My 98 machine is so (in your words) broke. XD The thing crashes every day. I've had it for 3 years, and it's been on for *most* of that time, never having been reinstalled.

The poor thing is ready to blow up, I think. ;)
 
  • #35
Slackware linux. And I've got to say, its awesome. Extremely fast, very customizable and has this festive feel to it.

I've had some major headaches trying to compile and install some programs, but its worth it. And in the end I have one of the most powerful systems in the neighborhood.
 
  • #36
For me it's Solaris 8 (on an old Ultra 5) and that's because I haven't bought any new hardware recently to build a new, faster i386 arch machine. Thus I'm stuck with this for now as my main workstation.

I run Debian as well, but that's on my old 333MHz CPU that works only as the firewall workhorse. I Don't want to bog it down with running X.

<sigh> Ultra 5's framebuffer leaves much to be desired, I'm afraid. I have to run the M64 Graphics Accelerator in 1024x768x60 resolution to keep 24-bit TrueColor. Alas no 1280x1024 for me.

...Unless anyone knows a way around this ...that would be nice :wink:
 
  • #37
I use win 98se for almost every thing and then use Redhat for the rest. Linux needs to be more user friendly. The fact that redhat won't play mp3's out of the box or many games is a problem for them.
 
  • #38
oh, boy. is it that hard to go to the xmms website and download the mp3 plugin.

If your unhappy with redhat, try debian
 
  • #39
Most users won't know how to do that. It's stupid that redhat has that problem. I have debian cds right now. I'm going to use it on my next pc and I also use Knoppix STD
 
  • #40
I use XP, also sometimes when I need, use 98SE.
 
  • #41
Originally posted by Tweek
I use win 98se for almost every thing and then use Redhat for the rest. Linux needs to be more user friendly. The fact that redhat won't play mp3's out of the box or many games is a problem for them.

It isn't stupid. It's a patent issue. From the xmms website:

Redhat 8 shipped without support for mpeg audio due to concerns about patents.

FWIW, Windows doesn't ship with Winamp.
 
  • #42
I like XP. It hasn't crashed. It's pretty stable.

I constantly hear how linux is great etc..etc...it's kinda annoying, but for the average Joe Luser who doesn't care to know what these terms are: patch your kernel, update your rpm's, check your version dependencies. It would be just too much aggravation and frustration on their part to use Linux.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
681
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K