Is liquid helium composed of both ortho and para-helium?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Creator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Helium Liquid
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Liquid helium below 8 K contains a mixture of both ortho and para-helium, with para-helium being the ground state. The decay of ortho-helium to para-helium occurs primarily through collisional processes, rather than single-photon transitions, which are prohibited by selection rules. The most probable method for generating triplet helium involves irradiating helium to excite it from the singlet ground state to a state capable of decaying to the triplet state. The lifetime of the He(2S^3) state is approximately 8000 seconds, indicating a significant meta-stable state.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum states, specifically ortho and para-helium.
  • Familiarity with two-photon decay processes in atomic physics.
  • Knowledge of collisional processes and their role in atomic transitions.
  • Basic principles of Bose-Einstein Condensates (BECs) and their formation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanisms of two-photon transitions in atomic systems.
  • Explore the conditions required for creating triplet helium experimentally.
  • Investigate the role of collisional processes in atomic decay and spin flips.
  • Study the implications of meta-stable states in quantum mechanics and astrophysics.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the properties and behaviors of liquid helium and atomic transitions.

Creator
Messages
566
Reaction score
6
In a batch of liquid helium (say < 8* K.) is there a mixture of both ortho and para-helium, or is it only ground state para-helium.?
I was under the impression that ortho was a meta-stable state which cannot decay to ground state Para-helium by radiative emission, but by meta-stable we are talking only a fraction of a second...right?

What am I missing here.?

Anyone?
..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IIRC, the singlet-triplet splitting is quite large, ~20 eV. So it should be entirely in the ground state, unless there are special conditions going on (they've made triplet-helium BECs).

It can decay radiatively, just not by a single-photon process.
 
alxm said:
IIRC, the singlet-triplet splitting is quite large, ~20 eV. So it should be entirely in the ground state, unless there are special conditions going on (they've made triplet-helium BECs).

Thanks alxm...
What special conditions are you referring to ? How do I create triplet state experimentally?

It can decay radiatively, just not by a single-photon process.

So if triplets decay after 1/10 second (is that about correct?) then by what process do they decay?
 
Last edited:
Creator said:
What special conditions are you referring to ?

Well I was thinking if you specifically generate triplet helium and then cool it in an optical trap or similar. Not exactly your usual state of affairs.

So if triplets decay after 1/10 second (is that about correct?) then by what process do they decay?

This is a 'forbidden' transition; It can only occur (in an isolated atom) due to two-photon processes, which one can think of as a decay to a 'virtual' level in-between the two states. For Helium it's not symmetric; one of the photons carries more energy than the other, so you end up with two peaks, one at ~70 nm and one at ~2400. (See e.g. http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.180.25" , if you want some details)

1/10 of a second.. I'm not sure. An isolated 3He atom would probably have a lifetime orders of magnitude longer. But with gaseous or liquid helium, in a container, etc, you have many more interactions that can go on and assist the process. (For instance formation of a He2 molecule in the ^3\Sigma_u^+ state.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
alxm said:
Well I was thinking if you specifically generate triplet helium and then ..

That was my other main concern: By what method would you "specifically generate triplet helium"??(not BEC)


This is a 'forbidden' transition; It can only occur (in an isolated atom) due to two-photon processes, which one can think of as a decay to a 'virtual' level in-between the two states. For Helium it's not symmetric; one of the photons carries more energy than the other, so you end up with two peaks, one at ~70 nm and one at ~2400. (See e.g. http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.180.25" , if you want some details)

Thanks for the G W Drake link. I'm not too sure I understand it all...Of course, Selection rules prohibit single photon transitiion ... so it goes two photon route...OK, but this rate is extremely low, right?
I have read elsewhere that the most probable decay is thru 'collisional' process, I am not sure what that refers to ...any info there?

GW Drake has a later article in which it appears as if he is saying that there is a MORE probable Magnetic dipole transition to ground state decay...am I reading that right?
See here:

http://cos.cumt.edu.cn/jpkc/dxwl/zl/zl1/Physical%20Review%20Classics/atomic/099.pdf


Creator
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Creator said:
That was my other main concern: By what method would you "specifically generate triplet helium"??

I haven't researched it, but off the top-of-my head you could simply irradiate the helium with a wavelength that excited it from the singlet ground state to a state that was able to decay to the triplet state. Given that that state has a relatively long lifetime, this should give you all the triplet helium you want, given that the radiation is sufficiently intense.

.OK, but this rate is extremely low, right? I have read elsewhere that the most probable decay is thru 'collisional' process, I am not sure what that refers to ...any info there?

Yes, that's the most probably situation for a non-isolated helium, and in practice the most common decay method. The easiest and most common is simply that two triplet-helium atoms collide and exchange an electron (or viewed another way: flip each other's spins). That process is fairly straightforward.

GW Drake has a later article in which it appears as if he is saying that there is a MORE probable Magnetic dipole transition to ground state decay...am I reading that right

It appears so. Guess I was wrong. Given that it appears Breit and Teller also thought the two-photon process was more likely, at least I'm in excellent company! :-p
Both forms of decay are certainly many orders-of-magnitude less significant than the collision route, in a 'normal' environment. This is all mostly of astrophysical interest, since space is full of helium atoms in high vacuum.
 
alxm said:
Yes, that's the most probably situation for a non-isolated helium, and in practice the most common decay method. The easiest and most common is simply that two triplet-helium atoms collide and exchange an electron (or viewed another way: flip each other's spins). That process is fairly straightforward.

Thanks again, Alxm. and sorry for the late response.

The collisional process is interesting...apparently, collision with a container wall can also do the trick.
1st question: At what temperature is there enough kinetic energy to spin flip each He triptlet state? Probably somewhere there is a temperature dependent rate formula?
2. Can collisional spin flip be by mecahnical means, (ex,rotation of the fluid) ?


It appears so. Guess I was wrong. Given that it appears Breit and Teller also thought the two-photon process was more likely, at least I'm in excellent company! :-p
Both forms of decay are certainly many orders-of-magnitude less significant than the collision route, in a 'normal' environment. This is all mostly of astrophysical interest, since space is full of helium atoms in high vacuum.


After further reasearch it appears as though I was wrong about the 1/10 sec. excited lifetime.
The He(2S^3) state lifetime is about 8000 seconds! That's a quantum eternity, and surprising...probably the longest"Meta-stable" state around...but makes sense knowing the fact that it is radiatively forbidden transition to ground.

Creator
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
18
Views
2K