Hi.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I'm currently working through Griffith's Introduction to QM, and have gotten to the section on the periodic table. I'll explain my understanding a little bit...

Before this he's been looking at the Hamiltonian for helium:

[tex]H = \left[ \frac{- \hbar ^2}{2m}\nabla _1 ^2 - \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon _0} \frac{2e^2}{r_1} \right] + \left[ \frac{- \hbar ^2}{2m}\nabla _2 ^2 - \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon _0} \frac{2e^2}{r_2} \right] + \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon _0} \frac{e^2}{|r_1 - r_2|}[/tex]

As a first attempt, he ignores the electron interaction energy altogether, the Schrodinger equation separates, and solutions can be written as products of hydrogen wavefunctions (only replacing e^2 with 2e^2 in the Bohr radius and energies):

[tex]\psi(r_1 , r_2) = \psi_{nlm}(r_1) \psi_{n'l'm'}(r_2)[/tex]We can construct symmetric and anti-symmetric combinations in the usual way:

[itex]\psi(r_1,r_2) = A[\psi_{nlm}(r_1) \psi_{n'l'm'}(r_2) + \psi_{nlm}(r_2) \psi_{n'l'm'}(r_1)][/itex]

and

[itex]\psi(r_1,r_2) = A[\psi_{nlm}(r_1) \psi_{n'l'm'}(r_2) - \psi_{nlm}(r_2) \psi_{n'l'm'}(r_1)][/itex].

We know that electrons are fermions, so the wavefunction has to be anti-symmetric under exchange of particles. However, it is thetotalwavefunction (position and spin) which must be anti-symmetric, so wecanhave symmetric spacial wavefunctions as long as they're with anti-symmetric spinors, etc. For example, this means that we can have both electrons in the n=1 state, [itex]\psi_0 = \psi_{100}(r_1) \psi_{100}(r_2)[/itex], so long as this is combined with the anti-symmetric spin configuration (singlet state).

If we now go on to lithium (Z=3), once again ignoring the electron interaction energy, the Schrodinger equation should separate to give

[tex]\psi(r_1 , r_2, r_3) = \psi_{nlm}(r_1) \psi_{n'l'm'}(r_2) \psi_{n''l''m''}(r_3)[/tex]

Now this is the bit I don't understand: Griffiths says that "by the Pauli exclusion principle only two electrons can occupy any given orbital (one with spin up, one with spin down - or more precisely, the singlet configuration). There are n^2 hydrogenic wavefunctions (all with the same energy) for a given n, so the n=1 shell has room for 2 electrons, the n=2 shell holds 8, and in general the nth shell can accommodate 2n^2 electrons."

I understand that each n state has degeneracy n^2 due to the orbital angular momenta, but the rest of that argument does not make much sense to me. For instance, how do we know that we cannot have the 3 electrons each in the n=1 state, [itex]\psi_0 = \psi_{100}(r_1) \psi_{100}(r_2) \psi_{100}(r_3)[/itex], so long as it is combined with an anti-symmetric spinor (as before). Do we not need to work out the possible spin configurations for three spin 1/2 particles before we can even start to work this out? Or am I missing the point entirely?

Thanks for any help! :)

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Number of electrons in each shell

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**