Is Marijuana Decriminalization Overdue?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mbisCool
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the penalties for marijuana possession and use, questioning whether they are reasonable and advocating for decriminalization. Participants express concerns about the financial burden on the justice system, particularly in states like Arizona, where resources are stretched thin due to the pursuit of marijuana-related offenses. Many argue that legalizing and taxing marijuana could provide significant revenue and reduce the strain on law enforcement.There is a consensus that the current penalties for small amounts of marijuana are excessive and that criminalization is counterproductive, particularly when compared to the societal harms caused by legal substances like alcohol and tobacco. Some participants highlight the inefficacy of prohibition, noting that it creates a black market that endangers users, especially youth.The conversation also touches on the medicinal use of marijuana, with some advocating for its legalization under strict regulations akin to those for alcohol. Concerns about the intoxicating effects of marijuana and the potential for increased use if legalized are discussed, but many argue that the benefits of regulation and taxation outweigh these risks.
  • #31
ThomasT said:
That's preferable to the damage to society that the continued criminalization of these things has caused.
What evidence is this claim based on? What facts are being used? How are the facts being evaluated?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Allowing marijuana to be sold via the black market sadly puts many kids in harm's way. I know a girl who was hit in the face and robbed of several hundred dollars by a dealer.

And to be honest I would argue that it may be even easier to get marijuana in many places easier when it is illegal. As long as it's illegal it will be very profitable, and only a phone call away. At least for alcohol they can ID you. It is certainly easier in washington to find drugs than find someone to buy you alcohol.
 
  • #33
Isn't that a George Carlin routine?
In Canada prescription drugs are very cheap but street drugs are more expensive.
While in the USA illegal drugs are much cheaper and more easily available than prescriptions.
The obvious solution is to make prescription drugs illegal!
 
  • #34
mgb_phys said:
While in the USA illegal drugs are much cheaper and more easily available than prescriptions.

Really? Easier to get; probably. But cheaper?
 
  • #35
Some facts, the Netherlands (2005, age group 15-64) vs USA (2006, age group 12 and older)

Cannabis
ever used: 23% vs 40%
recently used: 5% vs 10%
currently using: 3% vs 6%

Cocaine:
ever used: 3.4% vs 14.3%
recently used: 0.6% vs 2.5%

Source: http://www.minvws.nl/kamerstukken/vgp/2008/nationale-drug-monitor-2007.asp (p. 47 and 69)

Surprising? Draw your own conclusions. Education might also have something to do with those numbers. Personally I think it is better to buy things from a trusted seller who must abide to regulations, than from someone on the street. I've never used marijuana, so I belong to the 77% of people in the Netherlands.

More information can be found here: http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/publications/searchresults?action=list&type=PUBLICATIONS&SERIES_PUB=w36
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #36
Quick historical survey :

250px-Phelps_400m_IM_Missouri_GP_2008.jpg
marijuana

250px-Sherlock_Holmes_-_The_Man_with_the_Twisted_Lip.jpg
cocaine

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/a1/Queen_Victoria_-Golden_Jubilee_-3a_cropped.JPG/210px-Queen_Victoria_-Golden_Jubilee_-3a_cropped.JPG Opium

225px-George-W-Bush.jpe
Alcohol

MV5BMTk2NDMxNDY2MV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMTMxOTQ3MQ@@._V1._SX327_SY400_.jpg
EVERYTHING
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #37
I was watching a program the other day and they were saying traditional cannabis plants that aren't genetically engineered (like the ones you might buy in a new age shop) actually have more of an anti-psychotic drug in than the super strains you generally get illegally now. Which is interesting, as well as ironic. They actually grow these strains to extract the drug.

Personally considering just how dangerous alcohol and cigarettes are I have no problem with it's legalisation any more or decriminilisation. Your more likely to suffer from psychological problems from heavy drinking than heavy cannabis use, and your certainly much, much, much more likely to die from imbibing either. Also the level of crime due to alcohol is much higher than cannabis, which is associated with it mainly being illegal. I don't smoke it so I don't really care all that much, but it does seem to me to be ridiculously demonized considering how harmful it really is.
 
  • #38
but it does seem to me to be ridiculously demonized considering how harmful it really is.
Ecstasy is a class A drug in the UK (highest possible classification - automatic jail term etc) total deaths cause = zero.
But there were two photogenic newsworthy young girls that died after taking it.
One died of an undiagnosed heart condition the other died from water poisoning, she had drunk so many bottles of mineral water (because it's healthy) that she died from salt imbalance.
 
  • #39
The Dagda said:
I don't really care all that much, but it does seem to me to be ridiculously demonized considering how harmful it really is.

Like the fact that as a Schedule I drug its right next to heroin, I find that absurd.
 
  • #40
mgb_phys said:
Ecstasy is a class A drug in the UK (highest possible classification - automatic jail term etc) total deaths cause = zero.
XTC is considered a hard drugs in the Netherlands as well and is thus prohibited (although you can legally test pills at parties = control). Use can lead to over-heating/dehydration, depressions. It is risky to use in combination with alcohol and medication, as well as in combination with medical conditions such as heart disease, diabetes and epilepsy. Deaths are known to occur.

http://english.justitie.nl/images/The Netherlands Policy on XTC_tcm35-127570.pdf.
 
  • #41
Monique said:
Deaths are known to occur.
I wonder if any deaths have been caused by the compound rather than existing conditions?
If you blame deaths from cardiovascular problems, exhaustion or epilepsy then you might as well prohibit most sports.
It's interesting the opposite standards taken, anyone who says a prescription drug is dangerous is sued and hounded out of their post and vilified for creating a panic, as is any doctor who claims an illegal drug is harmless.
 
  • #42
The marijuana which gave me addictive pleasure at first - for six years - provided me access to harder drugs, including LSD. After the acid I toked six more years, but achieved little pleasant sensation, instead smoking out of habit, only to feel all of the disturbing effects of marijuana. It was not until I quit pot that I finally reached a sense of normalcy. I could well be homeless if I hadn't. Now, 25 years later, the hardest drug I ingest is chocolate.

By the way, I received a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia 6 months after my LSD experience. I now have the diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type.

Marijuana has recently been shown in an English study to significantly increase the incidence of psychoses in habitual users. I have seen elsewhere that 20% of users become habitual.
 
  • #43
Loren Booda said:
Marijuana has recently been shown in an English study to significantly increase the incidence of psychoses in habitual users. I have seen elsewhere that 20% of users become habitual.
Got some references? It can be claimed that some percentage of peanut-butter consumers as kids grow up to be long-term peanut-butter abusers. Peanut-butter sandwiches, Thai sauces, ants on a log... The devastation is extensive.
 
  • #44
It is clear to me that drug laws don't work and they cost the taxpayers billions. The rest is irrelevant.

When we had a family member with a hard-drug problem, we could have had him arrested, which would have cost the taxpayers $40k a year [or whatever it was in California to keep him in jail] and certainly would have ruined his life. Or, we could do nothing but try to handle it. We couldn't afford to send him through a drug treatment program.
 
Last edited:
  • #45
binzing said:
Thats not going to happen...

As far as the coops, sure for pot, if its legalized but cocaine has no good use, so we don't really need to grow coca plants.

it's a decent anesthetic. it used to be sold over the counter as toothache drops.

the columbians for centuries also chewed the leaves to stave off hunger and as a mild stimulant while they labored.

i'm not sure i'd agree there are many useless drugs, just bad uses. even one OTC product has a form of methamphetamine in it.
 
  • #47
Proton Soup said:
it's a decent anesthetic. it used to be sold over the counter as toothache drops.

the columbians for centuries also chewed the leaves to stave off hunger and as a mild stimulant while they labored.

i'm not sure i'd agree there are many useless drugs, just bad uses. even one OTC product has a form of methamphetamine in it.

True.

Hell Adderall (sp?) IS meth.
 
  • #48
adderal IS amphetamine but not methamphetamine

I just think its unfortunate. There is so much misinformation regarding the effects and dangers of marijuana. To be honest no argument againsts marijuana seems justified when we have perscription drugs, alcohol, and tobacco which account for unprecedented hardships.
 
  • #49
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #50
Hempfest in Seattle, Washington drew a crowd of around 150,000 this last August over A weekend.
 
  • #51
binzing said:
Like the fact that as a Schedule I drug its right next to heroin, I find that absurd.

I believe it's right next to opium in the US, which let's face it is unrefined heroin anyway. I find that absurd.

I also think ecstasy is a little too high on the scale and it most certainly shouldn't be in the same class as acid and crack. Cannabis should and is really a class C drug along with steroids. Ecstasy probably deserves a class B and hard drugs should be in the class A. That said the knee jerk right wing caused ecstasy to be miscategorised in the same way they caused cannabis to be miscategorised. You have to also take into account the level of criminality invovled with a drug, which means smoking should be a class A, and alcohol a class A (mainly because of how dangerous it is, plus both are associated with smuggling on a massive level in the UK due to the high tax). :wink::-p
 
  • #52
Monique said:
At this point that is still a hypothesis. Smoking tobacco increases the incidence of lung cancer and it very addictive, but apparently that is socially accepted.

Thats what makes this crazy. Its legal to sell something so addictive and deadly, but pot is illegal while it has roughly the same effects impairment wise, as alcohol.
 
  • #53
Loren Booda said:
The marijuana which gave me addictive pleasure at first - for six years - provided me access to harder drugs, including LSD. After the acid I toked six more years, but achieved little pleasant sensation, instead smoking out of habit, only to feel all of the disturbing effects of marijuana. It was not until I quit pot that I finally reached a sense of normalcy. I could well be homeless if I hadn't. Now, 25 years later, the hardest drug I ingest is chocolate.

By the way, I received a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia 6 months after my LSD experience. I now have the diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type.

Marijuana has recently been shown in an English study to significantly increase the incidence of psychoses in habitual users. I have seen elsewhere that 20% of users become habitual.

NMDA antagonists have severe side effects on the CNS and can cause hallucinations, motor impairment, and memory loss. So why does the FDA allow things on the market like Diazepam?

Yesterday I heard that cannabis use increases the incidence of testicular cancer. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...22&btnG=Search

It is already pretty much a well established fact that opioid use promotes cancer progression and metastases, so should morphine, codeine, etc. be illegal now?



Physcians and the FDA recognize that both NMDA antagonists and opioids still have beneficial therapeutic use. The pros outweigh the cons. Everything is a poison, you just have to administer the right dose. There is absolutely 0 good reasons why marijuana is illegal at least for medicinal purposes.
 
  • #54
David Nutt of the University of Bristol wrote an opinion piece for the Journal of Psychopharmacology which compared society's perceptions of risk of taking ecstacy with other activities. The light-hearted piece compared "equasy" or Equine Addiction Syndrome with perceived risks of drugs.

The piece found equasy, or horse riding, caused acute harm to a person once in 350 episodes while ecstacy caused acute harm once in 10,000 episodes.

Nutt asked: "So why are harmful sporting activities allowed, whereas relatively less harmful drugs are not? I believe this reflects a societal approach which does not adequately balance the relative risks of drugs against their harms... The general public, especially the younger generation, are disillusioned with the lack of balanced political debate about drugs."

http://jop.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/23/1/3
 
  • #55
Hurkyl said:
What evidence is this claim based on? What facts are being used? How are the facts being evaluated?
Good question. I don't know. But a quick survey of drug-related cases in Connecticut between 2002 and 2007 revealed a rather large (more than 10,000) number of drug-related arrests. About 1/3 were dismissed, about 1/3 were 'nolled'. A few thousand resulted in convictions and various penalties.
I'm probably a bit off in my recollection here. The point is that it uses a lot of resources (police and court time, jail time, parole time, probation time, etc.). The problem of drug abuse is better dealt with in other ways. And decriminalizing and regulating and taxing the production and sale of these substances puts a vast criminal subculture out of business.

It seems to me that the large drug cartels which now supply American users derive their power from the illegality of their product(s). That, and the street violence associated with the retail black market here in the US, and the rather large numbers of people doing time or awaiting prosecution for drug use and/or sales seems to me to be enough reason to at least seriously consider some sort of state-run program. It's been done with gambling, and alcolhol, and tobacco. Why not control drugs in a similar way? Why create an underground market and then leave it to that?
 
  • #56
To the OP first.
Decriminalize yes. Legalize, is a bit harder for me to just jump on a band wagon and say go for it.
Many issues about sales, quality controls, liabilities, etc. need to be addressed first.

I guess I'm one of the few here that will admit to smoking pot fairly regularly for 35+ years now. I have no intention of stopping. I also feel I am not 'addicted' to it. I often go for months without for one reason or another and really feel no withdrawal symptoms or any of that stuff.
I am 54 now and semi-retired. In all those years I have never committed any crimes to get it. I have never put myself in debt to get it and I have never sold it.
I have a small crop I tend ( 6-8 plants ) and grow at home in a back room. Someone mentioned earlier in this thread that you can't grow-at-home the 'good' stuff. I beg to differ. Mine is very, very good. I make it a hobby of sorts in my little garden to find and cross breed strains to get some very smooth smoke.

I guess my main issue is the private vs public aspect. I disagree with letting it out into public. Certainly not on the roads. In part I feel it should be treated the same as alcohol.
But, because of the ease of growing it would be impossible to control the 'approved' sources, and therefore the quality or traceability if a diseased batch was released.
If used in private, grown for personal use, I feel there should be no criminal charges.

I started another thread about the memory effects of THC but as the OP stated it is very difficult to keep discussions within rules. If I have over stepped any rules with my opinions please accept my apologies.
 
  • #57
mgb_phys said:
Quick historical survey :

250px-Phelps_400m_IM_Missouri_GP_2008.jpg
marijuana

250px-Sherlock_Holmes_-_The_Man_with_the_Twisted_Lip.jpg
cocaine

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/a1/Queen_Victoria_-Golden_Jubilee_-3a_cropped.JPG/210px-Queen_Victoria_-Golden_Jubilee_-3a_cropped.JPG Opium

225px-George-W-Bush.jpe
Alcohol

MV5BMTk2NDMxNDY2MV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMTMxOTQ3MQ@@._V1._SX327_SY400_.jpg
EVERYTHING


2009-01-14-obamaofficialfull.jpg

reportedly "dabbled"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #58
WhoWee said:
2009-01-14-obamaofficialfull.jpg

reportedly "dabbled"
The honors go to...Keef!

If there is a nuclear holocaust, there'll still be cockroaches and Keith Richards.
 
  • #59
I guess one of the major differentiators between the majority of people that drink alcohol and people that smoke marijuana is that the majority of people drink alcohol, not to get drunk, but for the pleasure of a few tasteful sips. I might have a tiny glass of sherry, a glass of good wine, a finger of exquiste brandy, etc... People that smoke pot do it to get stoned. Who takes one puff of marijuana for the taste experience and then stops?

Seriously, who here that smokes marijuana would do it without the sole intent to get high? That's the whole point, isn't it?
 
  • #60
I might have a tiny glass of sherry, a glass of good wine, a finger of exquiste brandy, etc...
Makes me go back to the New Years Eve party on chat. Sherry :bugeye:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 237 ·
8
Replies
237
Views
19K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
22K
Replies
85
Views
8K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K