russ_watters
Mentor
- 23,694
- 11,136
Simple, but just like Moore it is intentionally misleading.Alfi said:Name calling doesn't actually make your position stronger.
It still seems ro me that Mr. Moore states some facts and then wraps them in opinion. very biased opinion but just opinion none the less. The process makes money for him.
Then a site treats these opinions as if they were some kind of fact that Moore is pushing, and proceed to try and debunk an opinion.
I seems Mr Moore is quite good at stating facts, but not liked by a few for his opinions.
Is that simple enough?
For one, when you 'wrap your facts in very biased opinion' as you put it well enough, you intentionally obscure the facts. That is most certainly not consistent with someone who is "quite good at stating facts".
In addition, there is also only one real reason to use such tactics: your opinions don't stand up under scrutiny so you have to intentionally mislead to convince people your opinions are viable. People who cut through the intentionally deceptive wrapper see the opinions for what they are: blind religous-style beliefs that are unconnected with reality and unworthy of attention. Ironically enough, that makes Moore's target audience like-minded people who don't really need to be propagandized to agree with him! People who see through the deception are those who have a mindset that leads them to challenge it and they don't go to his movies anyway.