- #91
JohnDubYa
- 468
- 1
They are not going to be executed for being political prisoners, but for real crimes in which they terrorized a country with brutality.
Michael Moore - Minister of Disinformation?
- Context: News
- Thread starter Tigers2B1
- Start date
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around Michael Moore's filmmaking and alleged manipulation of facts, particularly in relation to his works such as "Fahrenheit 9/11." Participants examine claims of misinformation, personal anecdotes, and the broader implications of Moore's editing techniques and propaganda methods. The conversation includes critiques of Moore's credibility and the impact of his narratives on public perception.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
Main Points Raised
- Some participants assert that Michael Moore edits facts and events to manipulate viewer perceptions, citing specific examples from his films and books.
- One participant shares a personal anecdote about Fred Barnes, claiming that Moore fabricated a conversation, which Barnes denies ever occurred.
- Another participant questions the reliability of the rebuttal against Moore, suggesting it is merely one person's word against another's.
- Some participants express a belief in the validity of Barnes' claims, referencing established propaganda techniques attributed to Moore.
- There are references to other individuals who have publicly criticized Moore, including Christopher Hitchens, who discusses inconsistencies in Moore's arguments and positions over time.
- Concerns are raised about the potential for Moore's films to mislead audiences through selective editing and omission of facts.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus; multiple competing views remain regarding the credibility of Michael Moore and the validity of claims made against him. Some support Barnes' perspective, while others question the strength of the evidence presented.
Contextual Notes
Limitations include the reliance on personal anecdotes and subjective interpretations of Moore's work, as well as the absence of definitive evidence to support or refute claims made by either side.
Similar threads
- · Replies 3 ·
- · Replies 34 ·
- · Replies 58 ·
- · Replies 27 ·
- · Replies 3 ·
- · Replies 49 ·
- · Replies 10 ·
Graduate
Wellcome to the desert of the real
- · Replies 2 ·
- · Replies 3 ·