Is MW/hr a Valid Unit of Measurement for Power?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter HuntJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Unit
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the validity of the unit "MW/hr" as a measure of power, exploring its potential meanings and applications. Participants examine the distinctions between power and energy, and whether "MW/hr" can be considered a legitimate unit in various contexts, including theoretical and practical scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion over the use of "MW/hr," suggesting it may be a mistake for "MWh," while others argue it could represent the rate of change of power.
  • One participant notes that "MW/hr" could be interpreted as the "acceleration" of energy, indicating how power changes over time.
  • Another participant mentions that while "MW/hr" could theoretically make sense in specific contexts, such as measuring changes in a country's power generation capabilities, it is generally seen as an uncommon and potentially confusing unit.
  • Several participants agree that "MW-hr" is a valid unit for measuring energy, equating it to "MWh," but they differentiate it from "MW/hr," which they view as less useful.
  • There is a suggestion that "MW/hr" might be applicable in contexts like the ramp rate of a reactor, although its practical utility is questioned.
  • One participant highlights the public's misunderstanding of the distinction between energy and power, indicating that "MW/hr" is often misused in informal contexts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the validity of "MW/hr" as a unit. While some argue it can be meaningful in specific contexts, others contend it is not a useful or standard unit of measurement.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of clarity regarding the practical applications of "MW/hr," and participants express uncertainty about its acceptance in standard measurements. The discussion also reflects varying levels of familiarity with the terminology and concepts related to power and energy.

HuntJ
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I'm new to the forums and this seemed like the perfect place to discuss an issue that has been bugging me. I know MW refers to power (the rate of energy production basically in millions of Joules per second) and MWh refers to energy (essentially the total amount (in millions of Joules) of energy produced in an hour). But from time to time I've seen "MW/hr". Sometimes I think it must be a mistake and whoever wrote it must have meant "MWh", however on other forums (e.g. Yahoo! Answers) I remember seeing that MW/hr would indicate the rate of change of power but there didn't seem to be agreement on whether it was actually a real unit. So is this really a valid unit?
 
Science news on Phys.org
I saw a similar physics error on a sign in a local transit train a while back. I don't know what the writers mean, but energy per unit time squared is not a useful unit. If you know what the writer is talking about, and can look up real physics units elsewhere, you might be able to work out what he/she should have written.
 
i don't see why not, MW/hr is the rate of change in power, or the "acceleration" of energy. while power describes the amount of energy used per unit time, power/s would describe the amount of power used per unit time, or how the energy per unit time is changing. i don't think there's a distinction between a "real unit" and a "not real unit", the ones you usually see are the useful ones. for example the gravitational constant has units N*m^2/kg^2 or m^3/(s^2 * kg), I don't think there's such thing as a unit that is "not valid", maybe just not useful
 
There would be very specific cases where such a unit could make any sense. If I asked how is the power generating abilities of a country changing over time, someone could say that country X is increasing its power generating abilities by 35 GW/year... which you could reduce down to MW/hour, although that would be kinda silly.

Your ideas of what the units mean are correct.
 
Where I saw the unit was on a sign trumpeting the fabulous amount of power available from the sun, quoting in MW/hr. This does not make sense. Yes, one could imagine a scenario where MW/hr is meaningful, with respect to the ability of a power plant to respond to rapidly changing demand, but in the context of the sign it's incorrect.
 
Another possibility is that they don't mean to use it as a unit. In one hour the sun emits 1.385×10^30 J of energy coresponding to 3.846×10^20 MW. Perhaps they meant MJ/h but meant to say that in one hour, this is how much power is produced by the sun
 
MW-Hr is a valid unit as a measure of energy produced or consumed, 1MW-Hr is 3600 MJ (Mega Joules). It's rather easier to picture 24 Kw-Hrs as a fan heater running all day rather then 86,400 KJ.
 
JeffKoch said:
Where I saw the unit was on a sign trumpeting the fabulous amount of power available from the sun, quoting in MW/hr. This does not make sense. Yes, one could imagine a scenario where MW/hr is meaningful, with respect to the ability of a power plant to respond to rapidly changing demand, but in the context of the sign it's incorrect.
There is a lot of misconception, in the general public, on the distinction between energy and power. As you said, it doesn't make sense to say the power is ___ MW/hr. Whoever wrote that does not understand it, and we can only guess as to the actual meaning.
 
there is nothing invalid about MW/hr, but I don't think that it means much as a unit. I don't think it has many applications. MW-hr is a measure of energy.
 
  • #10
What is the ramp rate of the reactor? 90 MW/hr. Usually it's expressed in percent full power per hour but MW/hr works as well.
 
  • #11
Jobrag said:
MW-Hr is a valid unit as a measure of energy produced or consumed, 1MW-Hr is 3600 MJ (Mega Joules). It's rather easier to picture 24 Kw-Hrs as a fan heater running all day rather then 86,400 KJ.

I know MW-hr is a valid unit. I talked about it in the original post (as MWh). MWh or MW-hr though refers to MW x hr. I was talking about the usage of MW / hr or MW per hour. I've seen it used on occasion but very rarely and often it seems incorrectly. I figured that there must be a correct usage for it otherwise some people on other forums wouldn't say it could mean anything, but in my Physics education I never came across it (I came across all the usual suspects of course like J, MJ, W, MW, MWh or MW-hr, etc).
 
  • #12
gordonj005 said:
i don't see why not, MW/hr is the rate of change in power, or the "acceleration" of energy. while power describes the amount of energy used per unit time, power/s would describe the amount of power used per unit time, or how the energy per unit time is changing. i don't think there's a distinction between a "real unit" and a "not real unit", the ones you usually see are the useful ones. for example the gravitational constant has units N*m^2/kg^2 or m^3/(s^2 * kg), I don't think there's such thing as a unit that is "not valid", maybe just not useful

Thanks gordon.

I suppose I should have asked if it was a useful unit but the rarity of it lead me to wonder if it was a proper standard/accepted unit or if it would be the equivalent of using "cubits/hr" as a measure of speed.
 
  • #13
Pengwuino said:
There would be very specific cases where such a unit could make any sense. If I asked how is the power generating abilities of a country changing over time, someone could say that country X is increasing its power generating abilities by 35 GW/year... which you could reduce down to MW/hour, although that would be kinda silly.

Your ideas of what the units mean are correct.

dacruick said:
there is nothing invalid about MW/hr, but I don't think that it means much as a unit. I don't think it has many applications. MW-hr is a measure of energy.

QuantumPion said:
What is the ramp rate of the reactor? 90 MW/hr. Usually it's expressed in percent full power per hour but MW/hr works as well.

Thanks guys. I suppose that is why I have only seen it rarely as the ramp rate of a reactor isn't going to be something that is often disseminated to the public. Usually any article about a reactor or power plant would only refer to it's power generating capabilities (which would usually be expressed in some form of watts such as MW or kW).

QuantumPion, would it be possible to determine the power production of the reactor only from the ramp time? Because 90MW/hr could mean the reactor goes from producing 0 to 90 MW over the course of an hour right? Or it could go from producing 0 to 45 MW over the course of a half-hour. So if it had a power generating capability of only 45 MW the ramp rate wouldn't seem particularly helpful in determining that from the ramp rate alone in a case where someone might have mistakenly used the ramp rate figure as the power generating capability.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
13K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
11K
Replies
35
Views
8K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K