Is My Perturbative Solution of this Equation Correct?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter norman86
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
norman86
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi all! I want to perturbatively solve this equation in [tex]\beta[/tex] at second order in [tex]\alpha[/tex]

[tex]\frac{\beta^{2}}{4}-\frac{3}{8}\beta^{4}\alpha+\frac{2}{3}\beta^{6}\alpha^{2}=\frac{1}{4}[/tex]

I rewrite this formula in this way

[tex]\beta^{2}=1+\frac{3}{2}\beta^{4}\alpha-\frac{8}{3}\beta^{6}\alpha^{2}[/tex]

When I try to solve it perturbatively, I obtain

[tex]\beta^{2}=1+\frac{3}{2}1^{2}\alpha-\frac{8}{3}\alpha^{2}\left(1+\frac{3}{2}1^{2}\alpha\right)^{3}[/tex]

The result is

[tex]\beta^{2}=1+\frac{3}{2}\alpha-\frac{8}{3}\alpha^{2}[/tex]

The square root of which gives

[tex]\beta=1+\frac{3}{4}\alpha-\frac{155}{96}\alpha^{2}[/tex]

I know that the correct result is

[tex]\beta=1+\frac{3}{4}\alpha+\frac{61}{96}\alpha^{2}[/tex]

Clearly, there is something wrong in the second order of my calculus.

Can anyone please tell me where I'm mistaking? Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm..
Not quite sure what you are doing here, I'm afraid.
Here's how I would do it.
Assume a power series expansion as the following:
[tex]\beta=1+k_{1}\alpha+k_{2}\alpha^{2}+++[/tex]
We are to determine the k's in orders of alpha.
Inserting in your equation, and retaining terms of order 0 and 1, we get:
[tex]1+2k_{1}\alpha=1+\frac{3}{2}*1\to{k}_{1}=\frac{3}{4}[/tex]

To order 2, we have:
[tex]k_{1}^{2}\alpha_{2}+2k_{2}\alpha^{2}=\frac{3}{2}*4k_{1}\alpha^{2}-\frac{8}{3}*1*\alpha^{2}[/tex]
Or, we get the equation for k_2:
[tex]\frac{9}{16}+2k_{2}=\frac{9}{2}-\frac{8}{3}[/tex]
Which yields:
[tex]2k_{2}=\frac{216-128-27}{48}=\frac{61}{48}[/tex]
whereby the result follows.
 
You are right. That's the right way to do it. Thank you very much!