Is my Proof for Proving g is Injective on (a,b) Correct?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that a continuous and differentiable function g on the interval (a,b) is injective if its derivative g'(x) is non-zero for all x in (a,b). The proof utilizes the Mean Value Theorem, demonstrating that assuming g(m) = g(n) leads to a contradiction, as it implies g'(c) = 0 for some c in (m,n), which contradicts the condition g'(x) ≠ 0. The proof is confirmed to be correct with a suggestion to clarify the phrasing regarding the proof by contradiction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Mean Value Theorem in calculus
  • Knowledge of the definitions of injective functions
  • Familiarity with continuous and differentiable functions
  • Basic proof techniques in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Mean Value Theorem and its applications in proving function properties
  • Explore the concept of injective functions and their significance in mathematics
  • Review techniques for constructing proofs by contradiction
  • Examine examples of continuous and differentiable functions to solidify understanding
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying calculus and real analysis, as well as educators looking to enhance their understanding of function properties and proof techniques.

K29
Messages
103
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[tex]g[/tex] is a continuous and differentiable function on[tex](a,b)[/tex]. Prove that if for all [tex]x\in(a,b)[/tex], [tex]g'(x)\neq0\Rightarrow[/tex] g is an injective function.

Is there anything wrong about my proof? I'm not comfortable in making logical mathematical arguments: I usually make small inaccuracies. Or do a lot of work going down a bad path Any help appreciated.


The Attempt at a Solution



We select an arbitrary sub-interval on [tex](a,b)[/tex]. We call it [tex](m,n)[/tex] We know that g is also continuous and differentiable on any sub-interval of the interval that it is continuous and differentiable on.

The "injective functoin" has the definition that [tex]f(a)=f(b)\Rightarrow a=b[/tex] That is, no two values on the domain can map to the same point on the co-domain.

So for now we shall assume that[tex]f(m)=f(n)[/tex]. This allows us to make use of the Mean value theorem which states that if a function is continuous and, differentiable on an interval, in this case [tex](m,n)[/tex] and [tex]f(m)=f(n)[/tex] then [tex]\exists c\in (m,n)[/tex] such that [tex]g'(c) = 0[/tex]. This leads to a contradiction as [tex]g'(x)\neq0[/tex]. Therefor no such interval [tex](m,n)[/tex] can exist. Hence [tex]f(m)=f(n)\Rightarrow m=n[/tex] (The point m on the domain is equivalent to(the same point as) n) and [tex]g[/tex] is injective.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The proof is ok. Your phrasing at the beginning is pretty awkward. You aren't selecting (m,n) to be an arbitrary sub-interval. You are doing a proof by contradiction. So you assume f is NOT injective. If f is NOT injective then there are two different points m and n such that f(m)=f(n). Now the rest of the proof is fine.
 
Thanks very much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K