Is My Solution to the Driven Spring Problem Correct?

member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this problem,
1718433290547.png

For part(a), I am not sure if I am solving it correctly. I define the usual cartesian x-y coordinate system at the base of the wall. This gives ##x = l_0 + q(t) + x_w(t) = l_0 + q(t) + d\sin(\gamma t)## which implies that ##\dot x = \dot q + d \gamma \cos (\gamma t)##

Therefore ##L = T - V = \frac{1}{2}m(\dot q + d \gamma \cos (\gamma t))^2 - 0.5kq^2##.

Is this please correct?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ChiralSuperfields said:
For part(a), I am not sure if I am solving it correctly. I define the usual cartesian x-y coordinate system at the base of the wall. This gives ##x = l_0 + q(t) + x_w(t) = l_0 + q(t) + d\sin(\gamma t)## which implies that ##\dot x = \dot q + d \gamma \cos (\gamma t)##

Therefore ##L = T - V = \frac{1}{2}m(\dot q + d \gamma \cos (\gamma t))^2 - 0.5kq^2##.

Is this please correct?

Thanks!
Yes, it looks correct.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes MatinSAR and member 731016
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top