MHB Is \( n \) Equal to 23 in the Given Trigonometric Product Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation \( (1+\tan 1^{\circ})(1+\tan 2^{\circ})\cdots(1+\tan 45^{\circ})=2^n \) leads to the determination of \( n \). By using the identity \( 1 + \tan(45^\circ - k) = \frac{2}{1 + \tan k} \), pairs of terms can be simplified to yield \( (1 + \tan k)(1 + \tan(45^\circ - k)) = 2 \). This results in 22 pairs contributing to the product, giving \( (1+\tan 1)(1+\tan 2)\cdots(1+\tan 44) = 2^{22} \). Including \( 1 + \tan 45 = 2 \) leads to the final product being \( 2^{23} \). Therefore, \( n \) is determined to be 23.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Given that $$(1+\tan 1^{\circ})(1+\tan 2^{\circ})\cdots(1+\tan 45^{\circ})=2^n$$, find $n$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Given that $$(1+\tan 1^{\circ})(1+\tan 2^{\circ})\cdots(1+\tan 45^{\circ})=2^n$$, find $n$.

Note k in degrees and degree symbol not mentioned

tan (45-k)) = (tan 45- tank )/( 1+ tan 45 tan k)
= ( 1- tan k)/ (1 + tan k)
So 1+ tan (45-k) = ( 1+ tan k + 1 – tan k) / ( 1+ tan k) = 2/(1+ tan k)
Or (1 + tan (45-k))(1+ tan k) = 2

So (1 + tan 1) ( 1+ tan 44) = 2
(1+ tan 2)(1 + tan 43) = 2
( 1 + tan 22)(1+ tan 23) = 2

Hence (1+tan 1)( 1+ tan 2) … ( 1 + tan 44) = 2^22

As 1 + tan 45 = 2 so multiplying we get
(1+tan 1)( 1+ tan 2) … ( 1 + tan 44)( 1+ tan 45) = 2^23
hence n = 23
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top