Is NASA Really Saying Goodbye to the Space Shuttle Program?

  • Context: NASA 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Universe_Man
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

NASA is transitioning away from the Space Shuttle program in favor of a new Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV), which will utilize a larger capsule design. This decision is driven by cost concerns and safety factors, as capsules provide a higher safety margin for human re-entry compared to shuttles. However, while capsules offer enhanced safety, they lack the high lift-to-drag ratio of shuttles, limiting their maneuverability and requiring precise trajectory predictions for landing.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of aerospace engineering principles
  • Familiarity with spacecraft design and safety protocols
  • Knowledge of trajectory prediction methods
  • Awareness of NASA's space exploration history and objectives
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specifications and design features of the Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV)
  • Learn about the aerodynamic principles affecting spacecraft re-entry
  • Explore the historical context of NASA's Space Shuttle program
  • Investigate trajectory prediction techniques used in ballistic capsules
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, space program analysts, and anyone interested in the evolution of NASA's spacecraft design and safety measures.

Universe_Man
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
I heard somewhere that NASA is going back to the old days with space capsules and such because of the expense and other problems that the space shuttle is having. is that true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Universe_Man,
Universe_Man said:
I heard somewhere that NASA is going back to the old days with space capsules and such because of the expense and other problems that the space shuttle is having. is that true?
It is true. I am an engineer working on one of the two larger industry teams that is bidding on the Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV). NASA is the one dictating what the shape (Outer Mold Line or OML) is going to be. But it is going to be a much larger capsule than Apollo.

There is little doubt that a capsule has a higher factor of safety in bringing a human home to the Earth over a flyable shuttle. But the flyable shuttle offers a benefit that the capsule does not: High Lift-to-Drag ratio, which equates to a greater ability to provide lateral (crossrange) maneuvers. What all this mumbo jumbo equates to is an increased FLEXIBILITY of available places to land.

You have to be a lot more precise with trajectory predictions when you use a (ballistic) capsule because you have less aerodynamic capability to correct trajectory errors.

Make sense?
Rainman
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
5K
  • · Replies 183 ·
7
Replies
183
Views
19K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K