Is NetMath a Good Option for Learning Multivariable Calculus Online?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ebaywannabe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Program
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the Multivariable Calculus course offered through UIUC's NetMath online program, which utilizes Mathematica notebooks for instruction. Participants express mixed opinions on the effectiveness of this approach for learning math, particularly for applications in physics. While some argue that a solid grasp of multivariable calculus is essential for understanding physics concepts, others suggest that a theoretical understanding may not be necessary for practical applications. Concerns are raised about the intuitiveness of the Mathematica tools and the potential for missing broader concepts due to a focus on specific examples. The consensus leans towards the idea that while the course may provide valuable learning opportunities, supplementing it with traditional textbooks could enhance understanding. Overall, the program is seen as a viable option for those unable to attend in-person classes, but the importance of a comprehensive grasp of the material for future physics studies is emphasized.
ebaywannabe
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I'm thinking of taking Multivariable Calculus through UIUC's NetMath online program:
http://netmath.uiuc.edu/
The course is taught largely through Mathematica notebooks:
http://www.matheverywhere.com/mei/
Does anyone have any experience with this program or have any advice on whether it's a good way to learn math? It's difficult for me to attend courses in-person, and I'm not really cut out for self-study. So this seems like a good compromise.

I am not looking for a theoretical understanding of math, I'm more interested in it as it applies to physics. I'm not looking to earn a degree, I just want to learn.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"I am not looking for a theoretical understanding of math, I'm more interested in it as it applies to physics. I'm not looking to earn a degree, I just want to learn."

If your end goal is to crank out some integrals to solve intermediate mechanics style problems, then you don't need a good understanding of the math. On the other hand if you want to learn modern physics (or even old physics, e.g. GR), you will certainly need a deeper understanding of the math. For example you need to know advanced calculus well so that you can go on to learn differential topology and geometry. You'll want to learn 'multivariable calculus' at the level of Munkres (https://www.amazon.com/dp/0201315963/?tag=pfamazon01-20) for this.
 
It depends on whether or not he wants to go into theoretical physics. I won't ever have to look at differential topology. So it depends on your goals.
 
I looked at a few of the sample Mathematica notebooks and wasn't impressed. The tools they use to generate pictures are unintuitive enough that they could be hard to pick up on your own. You're also always focused on nitty-gritty examples, which may obscure important aspects of the big picture that are helpful whether you're interested in theory or applications. I hope there is also some sort of companion text.

I think conventional textbooks would probably be a better approach, but I'm not sure if there are online courses available that use them. Certainly taking an course in whatever way it is designed is helpful, and UIUC is a respected institution, so you should learn things. If it's the best option you have, you certainly nothing to lose and you can always learn the math at a higher level later if necessary.

Whether it will be good enough to make you comfortable with applied math for physics is impossible to say. Multivariable calculus is relied on virtually everywhere in physics above the introductory university level, so having a solid understanding of it is important to future studies. To some extent, a "solid understanding" means knowing how things relate theoretically, just not how to calculate things.

Still, if you're just starting out learning multivariable calculus, a text like Munkres is far above the level you will need for quite some time -- it will be at least several years until you arrive at fields like particle physics and general relativity. Even then, I'm not convinced that knowing math at that level of theoretical sophistication is necessary.

My background: undergraduate physics/math major in my final year.
 
Thanks for looking over the coursework. I'm planning to use a paper textbook along side the online work, just to make sure I'm getting a full perspective. This will be my first exposure to vector calculus.
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K